Skip to main content

How to Show a Mormon the Difference Between the Mormon Jesus and the Biblical Jesus

Image
By

I find that Mormons frequently claim that they are Christians, and that they want to be referred to as Christians, and that they have even recently sought to distance themselves from the word “Mormon.” The problem is, they worship another Jesus, and here is how to show them the difference between the Mormon Jesus and the Biblical Jesus. Before we get to that, some clarifications are necessary. Specifically, that they cannot even distance themselves from being called "Mormons."

 

The Mormon President Russell Nelson said, 

 

“What’s in a name or, in this case, a nickname? When it comes to nicknames of the Church, such as the “LDS Church,” the “Mormon Church,” or the “Church of the Latter-day Saints,” the most important thing in those names is the absence of the Savior’s name. To remove the Lord’s name from the Lord’s Church is a major victory for Satan. When we discard the Savior’s name, we are subtly disregarding all that Jesus Christ did for us—even His Atonement.”[1]

 

So, according to Nelson, to call Mormons, Mormons, is a victory for Satan. So, this also means that to call an anti-Mormon (an arguably pejorative term for those who speak against LDS beliefs), an anti-Mormon, a name that they are told not to use by their own president, is also a victory for Satan. In other words, Mormons are anti-Mormons if they use the term, “anti-Mormon.”

 

If you use the term, “anti-Mormon,” then you are an anti-Mormon

 

The logic is simple:

1.     Mormons are told not to refer to themselves as Mormon because it removes the word “Jesus.”

2.     Calling someone an anti-Mormon removes the word “Jesus,” and refers to themselves as Mormons.

3.     Therefore, Mormons who call other people “anti-Mormon” are anti-Mormon themselves.

 

So, when someone calls you an anti-Mormon, tell them that they are as well. Now that we have this understanding, we can continue with how Mormons worship another Jesus. Mormons either knowingly or unknowingly try to intrude on the title, Christian. But the problem is, they have fundamentally different beliefs about Jesus than Christians. 


The Difference

The Mormon Jesus is ultimately a created being. According to Mormons, Heavenly Father (the Mormon phrase for “God”) created Jesus and therefore Jesus has a beginning. 

 

“We believe Jesus is the Son of God the Father and as such inherited powers of godhood and divinity from His Father, including immortality, the capacity to live forever. While He walked the dusty roads of Palestine as a man, He possessed the powers of a God and ministered as one having authority, including power over the elements and even power over life and death.”[2]

 

The difference between the Mormon Jesus and the Biblical Jesus can often take some linguistic acrobatics in order for Mormons to understand that the Mormon Jesus is fundamentally different than the Jesus we see in the Bible. If you ask a Mormon if they worship the same Jesus as Christians, they will almost always say that they do. Then your next step is to ask them if Jesus had a beginning; if He was ever created. They will say that He existed before the creation, and was with the Father before the creation of the world. The problem is that this sounds like what Christians believe, but it is fundamentally different. What they mean is that Heavenly Father (the Mormon phrase for “God”), created spirits before the world began. 

Mormons believe that “We lived as spirit children of God in a premortal existence.”[3] In other words, Heavenly Father created spirit children and eventually, these spirits were sent to earth, and filled all human bodies, but the problem is that we forgot our pre-mortal existence.[4] Jesus was supposedly one of these spirit children. So, according to Mormons, Jesus did exist before the creation of the world, but not before the creation of spirit children. This is the fundamental difference between Mormons and Christians about the beliefs in the deity of Christ. Perhaps a good question to ask Mormons at this point is, "Did Jesus exist before the creation of spirit children?" To this question, they will answer "no," and this is how you can begin to show them the difference between The Mormon Jesus and the Christian Jesus.  


NOTE: For the Mormons who say that they do not believe that Jesus is a created being, the difference can still be found between the Mormon Jesus and the biblical Jesus through the Mormon teaching that the Father and the Son are two distinct beings. But otherwise, if you press them on whether or not Jesus is the "first born spirit child of Heavenly Father," they cannot deny this based on their scripture. Some may try to explain that Heavenly Father is a re-arranger of particles, and in this sense, Jesus has always existed, but still not as a person (or even a spirit). In any event, press them on Jesus being the first born spirit child of Heavenly Father.





For a Mormon, Jesus is ultimately a created being, but for a Christian, Jesus is not a created being. He always existed. In the gospel of John, verses one through three, we find in the King James Version of the Bible, the Bible that Mormons claim is their own scripture, “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. The same was in the beginning with God. All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made.”[5] So then according to this passage, Jesus, at the beginning of all that is created, was already in existence. Not only that, but the Bible says that all things were created through Him. This would seem to include spirit children. This is the fundamental difference between what Mormons believe about Jesus and what Christians believe about Jesus. This is also why we should continue to refer to Mormons as Mormons and not as Christians.

After you ask them if Jesus had a beginning, show them how the Bible communicates that this is impossible. It is impossible because Jesus would’ve had to create Himself, according to John 1:1-3, which is absurd. “Without Him was not any thing made that was made.” The Christian Jesus is fundamentally different from the Mormon Jesus because He is not a created being. If you have a conversation with a Mormon willing to discuss this in depth, they must come to agree with you about the differences, because these differences become glaringly clear. Perhaps then, they may understand why Christians do not call Mormons Christian.

I think this distinction is necessary because it is deceiving to those unaware and seeking. If there is a person who heard the name of Jesus and is curious about it, they may begin to seek Him and bump into “The church of Jesus Christ of the Latter-day Saints.” When the unfamiliar or even strange doctrines start to appear, and the seeker responds, “Are you a Christian?” and the Mormon replies in the affirmative, deception indeed takes place. This distinction is absolutely necessary. 

Mormons refer to themselves as Mormons when they call someone an anti-Mormon, so where is the error when Christians want to continue calling them Mormons as well? They call themselves such when they speak the term, anti-Mormon, and they believe in a fundamentally different (Mormon) Jesus. Until some big and necessary changes happen in Mormon beliefs and doctrine, let’s keep the title Christian away from Mormonism.

 

“Contend for the faith that was once for all delivered to the saints.” –Jude 3

 

 

For more, see my book on Mormonism:

https://www.amazon.com/Mormonism-Refuting-Fundamental-Apologetics-Latter-Day/dp/1662885377/ 



 

 Written by Nace Howell through the grace of the Lord Jesus.


 © Nace Howell, 2023 

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Objectivity is the Language of Heaven

By
NDErs (i. e. people who have claimed to have had a   Near Death Experience ) often report that when they go to Heaven, they frequently see and recognize people such as friends and family members. It is often also reported that when they were communicating with friends and relatives, they realized that they weren’t speaking English, but that they were telepathically speaking to one another.   It seems it would be impossible to have communication with others without learning every language that has ever existed under the sun, but since heaven is a perfect place, [1]  then communication should be perfect as well. In other words, it seems unlikely that there are barriers to communication. So, I should be able to communicate with the Apostles, upon my arrival for instance, but how? I personally only really know how to speak English fluently. My Spanish, Japanese, German, Russian, Chinese, and Latin is like that of a child, and my Greek is only in reading and writing.  If ...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Dividing Line of Doctrine

By
How and Where to Make Divisions... Sometimes, I get asked “Why do you get so up at arms about other religions?” or, “Why do you pick on other religions so much?” I think the following will help you see where I’m coming from, before I spill the beans on such.   We have difficulty sometimes in discovering where to make divisions when considering where to spend our money, and who to support, where to make purchases, and where not to do such. We also often have difficulty on how to know if a church or a congregation is a place where someone can actually become saved. Like, how can we know that a Mormon is likely not saved but we can know that a regular church attender at a gospel sound church is likely saved? What is it that would make my church attendance at a specific body no longer appropriate? Both answers to these questions deal with doctrine. If a company is pushing false doctrine using their influence and power to push a heretical doctrine or teaching, this is often when the red...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Highest Virtue

By
A virtue is a trait of excellence. What is the highest virtue? It seems that based on the nature of truth, that truth itself is perhaps the highest virtue. For instance, I could say that love is the highest virtue, but then I could ask the question of whether that is true or not. If it is or isn’t true, this places truth virtuously higher than love, at least in some sense. The fact that I can question love through the lens of truth seems to place truth above love in height of virtue. On the other hand, if I said that truth is the highest virtue, then it seems that it would be loving to tell others the truth! Perhaps truth and love go hand in hand, but this also concerns the nature of what truth is.  Truth is a requirement for love, which I argue here , but is love a requirement for truth? Love must contain truth in order to be  true  love. But truth does not have to contain love in order to be true truth. Take for instance, mathematics, or numbers in general… Sometimes, t...
Post a Comment
Read more

Self-tests of Some of the World's Religions

By
It is fairly common for a religion of the world to give itself a sort of test for truth, since this is one question that is asked of any religion: “Why should I believe what you are telling me is true?” After all, the answer to such a question will ultimately result in followers of specific beliefs and doctrines, let alone religions, or will result in a lack of followers.  If a religion can answer this question posed by seekers and thinkers, and therefore train its adherents to be able to answer why a religion is true, this will inevitably help people believe in such, even if the claims are false. If there is no answer, this is where a religion will perhaps find more trouble for itself.  Many religions make an appeal to a higher authority, namely,  God , for the veracity of their existence and as a result, no one can question the truth from such an authority. This is correct in a sense, that  if in fact God is making such a claim, then what is said or stated is true ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Who Made God? Identifying Categorical Errors

By
A category is simply a distinct class to which something belongs… A set of objects that can be treated as equal in some way. A Macintosh apple belongs to the category, apple, and not what we categorize as an orange. Similarly, colors are in a different category than taste.   When we say, “apples and oranges” what we mean is that there has been a confusion of categories. Sure, they are both fruit, but when you examine both, there is an obvious difference. An apple is not an orange, and an orange is not an apple. Macintosh, Granny Smith, and red delicious are all apples. Navel, blood, and Valencia are all oranges. To mix the two, for instance, to call a navel orange an apple, would be a categorical error, sometimes referred to as a category mistake.      How Identifying Categorical Errors can Help with Apologetics It seems that simply learning about or being reminded of categorical errors can help us be more aware of them. We have all heard or thought of ourselves, the...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Two Systems: A Confused Definition of Love

By
A couple years ago I wrote an article called  the Jehovah’s Witness training videos . The article was meant to be humorous in a sense, because there are likely not any actual training videos, but it seems that they have all watched them. We can suspect this because they all often have the same points of conversation. When you talk about the Trinity, they will use the Bible like a machine gun and shoot you with verses. The verses are always the same: Colossians 1:15, Mark 10:18… So, there is an implication that they all have the same information. There is one source from where they gather their patterns and behaviors. Similarly, I think we can see the power behind the system of the world as well. We can see what this power is like by the tracks he leaves behind. The contrast of the two systems is really seen in Revelation 14:8. “Fallen, fallen is Babylon the great, she who made all nations drink the wine of the passion of her sexual immorality.” John is using the word  Bab...
Post a Comment
Read more

Two Problems Jesus has with the Mormon Doctrine of Eternal Families

By
Mormonism teaches that those who are married in a temple can be married for eternity. In Doctrine and Covenants 132:15–20, we find the following:   15 Therefore, if a man marry him a wife in the world, and he marry her not by me nor by my word , and he covenant with her so long as he is in the world and she with him, their covenant and marriage are not of force when they are dead , and when they are out of the world; therefore, they are not bound by any law when they are out of the world. 16 Therefore, when they are out of the world they neither marry nor are given in marriage; but are appointed angels in heaven, which angels are ministering servants, to minister for those who are worthy of a far more, and an exceeding, and an eternal weight of glory. 17 For these angels did not abide my law; therefore, they cannot be enlarged, but remain separately and singly, without exaltation, in their saved condition, to all eternity; and from henceforth are not gods, but are angels of God for...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Evidence and Power of Testimony

By
What to say to People who Demand more Evidence for God. Why is there something rather than nothing? Glacier National Park. © Nace Howell, 2018. The question is, how much evidence do you require? Would Jesus have to come back and slap you in the face with evidence that He is God? It seems to me that there is a line we must draw. We do this in all other areas of our lives, so why would we treat theism any different? When a court convicts, they do so “beyond a reasonable doubt.” I would like to take a few moments to explore this a bit. But before we get to that, I want to pose a question, which is… why are you the standard? What makes you think He has to prove His existence to everyone individually? He already created the universe from nothing. In the beginning, there was a big bang. Seriously… do you believe your mom when she tells you a story about her day? Did you believe the reports of 9/11 when they were happening? Do you accept the testimony of anything you hear on social ...
33 comments
Read more

Baptism is Not Necessary for Salvation According to the Early Church

By
Let’s dive right in. The Bible says in Acts 2:37-41,    Now when they heard this they were cut to the heart, and said to Peter and the rest of the apostles, “Brothers, what shall we do?” And Peter said to them, “Repent and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins, and you will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit. For the promise is for you and for your children and for all who are far off, everyone whom the Lord our God calls to himself.” And with many other words he bore witness and continued to exhort them, saying, “Save yourselves from this crooked generation.” So those who received his word were baptized, and there were added that day about three thousand souls.   The phrase in Acts 2:38 that reads, “for the forgiveness of your sins” modifies the word repentance, not the word baptism.  See more about this Here .   What is interesting is that those who translate the above verse as meaning that baptism is a requ...
Post a Comment
Read more