Skip to main content

Using Guilt to Guide to the Truth

While taking a cultural apologetics class in my doctorate, I rambled along in a 30-page paper and in it, I wrote that, “I define religion as an anthropological system consisting of worship which is often filled with specific sacred rituals that seeks to appease or eradicate guilt.” My professor red-penned this and said that I am not yet in an authoritative position to make such definitions. But I was never asked how I came up with such a definition. The thing is, working on my second post-graduate degree in apologetics, studying many other religions on a deeper level was inevitable, and by this, I noticed a pattern in all of them which was the fact that they all seek to appease or eradicate guilt, including Buddhism, even though many adherents of Buddhism claim that it is not a religion. The point is that all religions seek to eradicate guilt on some level, because guilt crosses all cultures and times, to all people. 

Guilt transcends all people. The reason that I believe that it does this is because one, we continually and constantly witness and experience it, and two, according to Ecclesiastes 3:11, “God has put eternity into man’s heart.” I think the fact of so many religions in the world proves that man has eternity in his heart. It is generally estimated between 3000 and 4000 religions in the world today (though I find that estimated number climbing in atheist circles because they think that the more there are equals more absurdity). Man has eternity in his heart and the number of religions does not necessitate the absurdity of religion, but these numbers instead show a deep desire to eradicate guilt in human beings.

Romans 2:14-15 shows us the existence of morality into humanity, which points to the transcendent good. It reads, “Indeed, when Gentiles, who do not have the law, do by nature things required by the law, they are a law for themselves, even though they do not have the law. They show that the requirements of the law are written on their hearts, their consciences also bearing witness, and their thoughts sometimes accusing them and at other times even defending them.”

If there is a law on our hearts, convicting us between right and wrong, then this law transcends human beings. Mankind seeks to eradicate guilt because he ultimately knows that there is the right thing to do, and through self-examination, we know that there are times when we have not done the right thing. Goodness transcends us and so this is why there are so many religions… partially because of human blindness to truth, but also because human beings innately seek goodness. 

 

We are born with a longing for eternity, and peering into eternity causes us to reflect on our own existence. Specifically, our own goodness. 

 

I think that human beings naturally strive to be guiltless. The problem is that many people simply try to justify their behavior, which is arguably a form of eradicating guilt, and by doing so make themselves out to be their own god of sort. This is the Great Delusion… That a person can fix his or her own problem of sin, or that there simply is no sin. The Bible tells us that “It is by grace you have been saved through faith… not by works…” (see Ephesians 2:8-9).

 

 

Argument from guilt


The point of this article is to assist people in getting to the Moral Argument. Guilt points directly toward the moral argument for the existence of God.

If guilt is experienced by all people in all cultures, times, and places, then the standard for morality transcends us. 

 

1 Guilt seems to transcend humanity (You and I have experienced guilt). 

2 If guilt exists, then morals exist (Morality is a necessary condition for guilt to occur). 

3 Morals exist because God exists (The laws of morality exist because there is a lawgiver).

 

If someone were to argue that some people do not experience guilt, then we would consider something in them to be broken, so to speak. The Bible says in 1 Timothy 4:1-3, “Now the Spirit expressly says that in later times some will depart from the faith by devoting themselves to deceitful spirits and teachings of demons, through the insincerity of liars whose consciences are seared, who forbid marriage and require abstinence from foods that God created to be received with thanksgiving by those who believe and know the truth.” The phrase, “consciences are seared” means that their moral compass has been and is uncalibrated. In other words, broken. They do not know their right from their left, and their instrument panel is sparking and smoking. 

This further helps us understand that guilt is transcendent. Even speaking outside a biblical perspective, we know that there is something broken with certain criminals, which is one reason why we lock them away. Societies acknowledge that some moral compasses are uncalibrated based on sending people to jail. 

The fact that guilt exists proves to us that morals exist. We know right from wrong. If we see that there is a law in our hearts as Romans 2 says, then there must be a lawgiver. For every law there is a lawgiver. If only atheism were true, then why would anything matter? In atheism, there is no meaningful guilt, but there is also no hope, no purpose, no value, and no meaning to life.

 

 

Guilt and Shame

 

I think it is beneficial at this point to clarify what guilt is not. Sometimes, people confuse the differences between guilt and shame. When we do wrong, we can have a healthy view of our wrongs, and we can have an unhealthy view of them. Guilt says, did something wrong. Shame says am something wrong. See the difference? When we wear the guise of shame, it changes us negatively, hinders our productivity, lowers our confidence, and causes us to devalue ourselves. 

Shame, I would argue, sometimes leads us to holding a standard of righteousness higher than what God does for us. Sometimes we beat ourselves up after we sinned or did someone wrong, even after we confess our sins and receive forgiveness. The thing is, If God has forgiven you, why would you continually go back to it? Let. It. Go. After all, God does.

This is why we must see guilt for what it is, the Holy Spirits conviction, and confess our sins. If we do, He is faithful and just to forgive us for our sins and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness (1 John 1:9). This should ultimately change our view of ourselves. Being cleansed from all unrighteousness and having, as one who trusts in Christ alone, relationship with God, reminds us why we have value. True, real, and meaningful human worth… All because of Him. 



Written by Nace Howell through the grace of the Lord Jesus

© Nace Howell, 2024

Comments

  1. This is an interesting post, but I'm not sure that I agree with the logic to deduce that "Guilt points directly toward the moral argument for the existence of God." It seems like you're taking a statement from Ecclesiastes 3:11, “God has put eternity into man’s heart” to reason that morals exist because of God. What if there is no God? If we acknowledge that Ecclesiastes was written by a human, it can be deduced that morals are an innate part of being human, and no divine intervention is needed for morality to exist (because God doesn't exist, and yet we are moral beings). We should give credit where credit is due, and understand that morality and empathy are evolutionary developed over millions of years, because humans thrive in social settings and we all do better when we lift each other up.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If there is no God, then morals do not truly exist. If we invent morality (even through the processes of millions of years), yet at the time of our death cease to exist, then the question cannot be answered as to why life ever had any value to it. Whether we lived as Mother Theresa or Adolph Hitler, it wouldn't matter, but because morals do exist, it does matter how we live our lives.
      1. If moral values and duties do not exist, then God does not exist.
      2. Moral values and duties do exist.
      3. Therefore, God exists.

      Delete
    2. "If we invent morality" - yes I agree with this hypothesis ("we" being "humans")

      "yet at the time of our death cease to exist" - I also agree with this. I think this life is all we get and there is nothing after death.

      "then the question cannot be answered as to why life ever had any value to it" - I don't think this logically follows from the two previous statements. I think the question of whether or not life ever had any value to it can easily be answered by every living person. Our lives have meaning to and are enriched by those who we love and care for. People who understand that we are here to help each other in *this* life, who believe that living a moral life is worthwhile simply to make *this* world a better place, with no expectation of any eternal rewards or punishments. Because, at the end of the day, *this* life is the only thing that we know is true.

      Delete
    3. If all human beings cease to exist at the end of our lives, then what is the point of life? If the world will one day will be consumed by cosmic activity and there is cold, lifeless debris floating through space, why would life at all ever have mattered? If we do not live longer than our physical bodies, then life has no value. Nothing would matter. But thankfully, we do live longer than our bodies, because God exists. We can come to be saved from our moral failures through the work of Christ on the cross.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How to Show a Mormon the Difference Between the Mormon Jesus and the Biblical Jesus

I find that Mormons frequently claim that they are Christians, and that they want to be referred to as Christians, and that they have even recently sought to distance themselves from the word “Mormon.” The problem is, they worship another Jesus, and here is how to show them the difference between the Mormon Jesus and the Biblical Jesus. Before we get to that, some clarifications are necessary. Specifically, that they cannot even distance themselves from being called "Mormons."   The Mormon President Russell Nelson said,    “What’s in a name or, in this case, a nickname? When it comes to nicknames of the Church, such as the “LDS Church,” the “Mormon Church,” or the “Church of the Latter-day Saints,” the most important thing in those names is the absence of the Savior’s name. To remove the Lord’s name from the Lord’s Church is a major victory for Satan. When we discard the Savior’s name, we are subtly disregarding all that Jesus Christ did for us—even His Atonement.” [1]   So,

The Dividing Line of Doctrine

How and Where to Make Divisions... Sometimes, I get asked “Why do you get so up at arms about other religions?” or, “Why do you pick on other religions so much?” I think the following will help you see where I’m coming from, before I spill the beans on such.   We have difficulty sometimes in discovering where to make divisions when considering where to spend our money, and who to support, where to make purchases, and where not to do such. We also often have difficulty on how to know if a church or a congregation is a place where someone can actually become saved. Like, how can we know that a Mormon is likely not saved but we can know that a regular church attender at a gospel sound church is likely saved? What is it that would make my church attendance at a specific body no longer appropriate? Both answers to these questions deal with doctrine. If a company is pushing false doctrine using their influence and power to push a heretical doctrine or teaching, this is often when the red fla

Objectivity is the Language of Heaven

NDErs (i. e. people who have claimed to have had a   Near Death Experience ) often report that when they go to Heaven, they frequently see and recognize people such as friends and family members. It is often also reported that when they were communicating with friends and relatives, they realized that they weren’t speaking English, but that they were telepathically speaking to one another.   It seems it would be impossible to have communication with others without learning every language that has ever existed under the sun, but since heaven is a perfect place, [1]  then communication should be perfect as well. In other words, it seems unlikely that there are barriers to communication. So, I should be able to communicate with the Apostles, upon my arrival for instance, but how? I personally only really know how to speak English fluently. My Spanish, Japanese, German, Russian, Chinese, and Latin is like that of a child, and my Greek is only in reading and writing.  If communication is me

The Highest Virtue

A virtue is a trait of excellence. What is the highest virtue? It seems that based on the nature of truth, that truth itself is perhaps the highest virtue. For instance, I could say that love is the highest virtue, but then I could ask the question of whether that is true or not. If it is or isn’t true, this places truth virtuously higher than love, at least in some sense. The fact that I can question love through the lens of truth seems to place truth above love in height of virtue. On the other hand, if I said that truth is the highest virtue, then it seems that it would be loving to tell others the truth! Perhaps truth and love go hand in hand, but this also concerns the nature of what truth is.  Truth is a requirement for love, which I argue here , but is love a requirement for truth? Love must contain truth in order to be  true  love. But truth does not have to contain love in order to be true truth. Take for instance, mathematics, or numbers in general… Sometimes, the truth hurts

Self-tests of Some of the World's Religions

It is fairly common for a religion of the world to give itself a sort of test for truth, since this is one question that is asked of any religion: “Why should I believe what you are telling me is true?” After all, the answer to such a question will ultimately result in followers of specific beliefs and doctrines, let alone religions, or will result in a lack of followers.  If a religion can answer this question posed by seekers and thinkers, and therefore train its adherents to be able to answer why a religion is true, this will inevitably help people believe in such, even if the claims are false. If there is no answer, this is where a religion will perhaps find more trouble for itself.  Many religions make an appeal to a higher authority, namely,  God , for the veracity of their existence and as a result, no one can question the truth from such an authority. This is correct in a sense, that  if in fact God is making such a claim, then what is said or stated is true , but the question

The Two Systems: A Confused Definition of Love

A couple years ago I wrote an article called  the Jehovah’s Witness training videos . The article was meant to be humorous in a sense, because there are likely not any actual training videos, but it seems that they have all watched them. We can suspect this because they all often have the same points of conversation. When you talk about the Trinity, they will use the Bible like a machine gun and shoot you with verses. The verses are always the same: Colossians 1:15, Mark 10:18… So, there is an implication that they all have the same information. There is one source from where they gather their patterns and behaviors. Similarly, I think we can see the power behind the system of the world as well. We can see what this power is like by the tracks he leaves behind. The contrast of the two systems is really seen in Revelation 14:8. “Fallen, fallen is Babylon the great, she who made all nations drink the wine of the passion of her sexual immorality.” John is using the word  Babylon  here for

Who Made God? Identifying Categorical Errors

A category is simply a distinct class to which something belongs… A set of objects that can be treated as equal in some way. A Macintosh apple belongs to the category, apple, and not what we categorize as an orange. Similarly, colors are in a different category than taste.   When we say, “apples and oranges” what we mean is that there has been a confusion of categories. Sure, they are both fruit, but when you examine both, there is an obvious difference. An apple is not an orange, and an orange is not an apple. Macintosh, Granny Smith, and red delicious are all apples. Navel, blood, and Valencia are all oranges. To mix the two, for instance, to call a navel orange an apple, would be a categorical error, sometimes referred to as a category mistake.      How Identifying Categorical Errors can Help with Apologetics It seems that simply learning about or being reminded of categorical errors can help us be more aware of them. We have all heard or thought of ourselves, the question, “Who mad

The Evidence and Power of Testimony

What to say to People who Demand more Evidence for God. Why is there something rather than nothing? Glacier National Park. © Nace Howell, 2018. The question is, how much evidence do you require? Would Jesus have to come back and slap you in the face with evidence that He is God? It seems to me that there is a line we must draw. We do this in all other areas of our lives, so why would we treat theism any different? When a court convicts, they do so “beyond a reasonable doubt.” I would like to take a few moments to explore this a bit. But before we get to that, I want to pose a question, which is… why are you the standard? What makes you think He has to prove His existence to everyone individually? He already created the universe from nothing. In the beginning, there was a big bang. Seriously… do you believe your mom when she tells you a story about her day? Did you believe the reports of 9/11 when they were happening? Do you accept the testimony of anything you hear on social

Two Problems Jesus has with the Mormon Doctrine of Eternal Families

Mormonism teaches that those who are married in a temple can be married for eternity. In Doctrine and Covenants 132:15–20, we find the following:   15 Therefore, if a man marry him a wife in the world, and he marry her not by me nor by my word , and he covenant with her so long as he is in the world and she with him, their covenant and marriage are not of force when they are dead , and when they are out of the world; therefore, they are not bound by any law when they are out of the world. 16 Therefore, when they are out of the world they neither marry nor are given in marriage; but are appointed angels in heaven, which angels are ministering servants, to minister for those who are worthy of a far more, and an exceeding, and an eternal weight of glory. 17 For these angels did not abide my law; therefore, they cannot be enlarged, but remain separately and singly, without exaltation, in their saved condition, to all eternity; and from henceforth are not gods, but are angels of God forever

Defending Christianity against Mormonism

“But in your hearts set apart Christ as Lord. Always be prepared to give an answer to everyone who asks you to give the reason for the hope that you have. But do this with gentleness and respect ” (NIV 1 Peter 3:15). In other words, LOVE THEM . Mormons                                                             Biblical Truths Mormons are monolaters, meaning, they believe in many gods, yet worship only one. LDS believe that “As man is, God once was; and as God is, man may become.” LDS do not believe in Hell. LDS believe God is flesh and bones. LDS believe in baptism for the dead. LDS believe Jesus and Satan are created brothers. LDS do not believe in the Trinity. LDS believe that “it is by grace we are saved, after all we can do” (Nephi 25:23). Deuteronomy 6:4 says, “Hear, O Israel: The Lord our God, the Lord is one” (See also Isaiah 43:11; Acts 5:4; 1 Timothy 2:5; Exodus 20:3; et. al.). God kn