Piling On the Burden: Mormonism and Its Historical Claims

Is it safe to conclude that because there is no archaeological evidence for the Book of Mormon that it is false?

The most highly prized, primary text in Mormonism (The Book of Mormon) makes the claims that there have been vast amounts of people (Jarom 1:8), involved in great wars in North America (Mormon 6:6-15), with swords, arrows, darts, javelins, etc. made of steel (Ether 7:9; Jarom 1:8), also having farming equipment made of steel (Jarom 1:8), and numerous minted coins of various worth (Alma 11:4-19). This is not even close to being an exhaustive list of archaeological issues found in the Book of Mormon. We could go on discussing chariots, horses, wheat, the use of Early Modern English in the Book of Mormon, and many others…

“The book of Mormon makes some extraordinary claims about there being wars with large numbers of warriors in the Americas. The problem with this is that there has been no archaeological evidence to support these claims that the Book of Mormon makes.”[1] I recently shared this quote from my book on social media, and an objection was made that it could be an argument from silence. He said that it is similar to the objection concerning the exodus, hinting that there is no archaeological evidence found concerning the exodus. First, there is archaeological evidence for the exodus,[2] second, to compare the Bible with the Book of Mormon is a false analogy, and third, because Mormons are asking people to accept the claims of the Book of Mormon, the burden of proof is on them. The burden of proof is on the Book of Mormon for making the claims that it does.

As far as the exodus is concerned, not only do we have proto-Israelite building foundations in Egypt, the Merneptah Stele, and several other archaeological evidences,[3] but we also have the book of Exodus itself. The Bible is not one book, but several books bound together. The book of Exodus found in the Bible is a book that recalls back to the time of the exodus through the memories of the author. He (Moses) wrote down the events of the exodus from Egypt, and this text is another thing we can add to the list of evidence for the exodus. We are not circularly “proving the Bible with the Bible,” but we can understand that the Bible contains the book of Exodus, which is ancient evidence for the exodus in a cumulative case. Like it or not, the book of Exodus is indeed evidence for the exodus.

Concerning the historical claims of the Book of Mormon, of all the construction projects that have happened in America, we were bound to run into something. We are building and building like never before, breaking new ground every day. This requires site development, and site development requires excavation. In our excavations, never have we found any coins, swords, farm equipment, steel, or anything remotely close to what the Book of Mormon describes. This fact makes time and archaeology, specifically enemies against such claims, since it seems that we have had endless amounts of time "looking" for such things without actually looking specifically, based on innumerable construction sites around the country.

Archaeology is a natural byproduct of the construction world. I was personally a heavy equipment operator for over a decade, and all the archaeologists that I have ever worked with were only concerned with modern burials (coffins) and American Indian remains and artifacts.[4] Why? Because we can know beyond reasonable doubt that nothing else archaeologically speaking is in the ground, or we would know about it. Archaeologists are not concerned with running into Mormon antiquities because there aren’t any. In Israel, by comparison, bulldozers are illegal to use in many places because the ancient antiquities below the surface are so rich in number. It does not even register to such a standard in America, even though, according to the Book of Mormon, it should.

The reason comparing the history of the Book of Mormon to the history of the Bible is a false analogy is because there is no archaeological evidence for any event that takes place in the Book of Mormon, but there is much archaeological evidence for many events that take place in the Bible. They are clearly in completely different categories. The difference is evident. There is no credible archaeological evidence for the Book of Mormon.

So, is it an argument from silence to say that there has been no archaeological evidence ever been found for the Book of Mormon? Not an argument from silence, but because the Book of Mormon makes such historical claims, Mormons bear the burden of proof because of such claims. Evidence matters, and the burden of proof is on them. The more they compare the Book of Mormon to the Bible, because the more biblical claims, events, people, and customs that are confirmed through archaeology,[5] and the more construction projects that we have in America without finding anything regarding or confirming Mormon historical claims, this means the heavier the burden of proof becomes on Mormonism. I find this to be a major reason people leave the Mormon faith.

So, is it safe to conclude that because there is no archaeological evidence for the Book of Mormon that Mormonism is false? Until they can bear the burden by proving the claims in the Book of Mormon are true, everything is unproven. The question is when does one draw the line…

Written by Nace Howell through the grace of the Lord Jesus

[1] Howell, Nace. Mormonism: Impossible: Refuting a Fundamental Mormon Doctrine and Using Apologetics to Reach the Latter-day Saints. Maitland: Xulon Press, 2023. 120. https://www.amazon.com/Mormonism-Refuting-Fundamental-Apologetics-Latter-Day/dp/1662885377/

[2] https://www.biblicalarchaeology.org/daily/biblical-topics/exodus/exodus-fact-or-fiction/.

[3] https://www.patternsofevidence.com/2019/06/01/artifacts-show-biblical-exodus/.

[4] I have personally been on job sites that had moved 800,000 yards of dirt, which is not uncommon on American soil.

[5] As well as confirming other ancient texts, such as Herodotus’ Histories, concerning which it is said, “archaeology graphically confirms Herodotus's observations.” (Welsby, Derek. The Kingdom of Kush. London: British Museum Press. 1996. Consider also the extreme archaeological discoveries surrounding Alexander the Great, King Tutankhamen, Constantine, and other historical figures.

Comments

How to Show a Mormon the Difference Between the Mormon Jesus and the Biblical Jesus

I find that Mormons frequently claim that they are Christians, and that they want to be referred to as Christians, and that they have even recently sought to distance themselves from the word “Mormon.” The problem is, they worship another Jesus, and here is how to show them the difference between the Mormon Jesus and the Biblical Jesus. Before we get to that, some clarifications are necessary. Specifically, that they cannot even distance themselves from being called "Mormons." The Mormon President Russell Nelson said, “What’s in a name or, in this case, a nickname? When it comes to nicknames of the Church, such as the “LDS Church,” the “Mormon Church,” or the “Church of the Latter-day Saints,” the most important thing in those names is the absence of the Savior’s name. To remove the Lord’s name from the Lord’s Church is a major victory for Satan. When we discard the Savior’s name, we are subtly disregarding all that Jesus Christ did for us—even His Atonement.” [1] ...

Objectivity is the Language of Heaven

NDErs (i. e. people who have claimed to have had a Near Death Experience ) often report that when they go to Heaven, they frequently see and recognize people such as friends and family members. It is often also reported that when they were communicating with friends and relatives, they realized that they weren’t speaking English, but that they were telepathically speaking to one another. It seems it would be impossible to have communication with others without learning every language that has ever existed under the sun, but since heaven is a perfect place, [1] then communication should be perfect as well. In other words, it seems unlikely that there are barriers to communication. So, I should be able to communicate with the Apostles, upon my arrival for instance, but how? I personally only really know how to speak English fluently. My Spanish, Japanese, German, Russian, Chinese, and Latin is like that of a child, and my Greek is only in reading and writing. If ...

The Highest Virtue

A virtue is a trait of excellence. What is the highest virtue? It seems that based on the nature of truth, that truth itself is perhaps the highest virtue. For instance, I could say that love is the highest virtue, but then I could ask the question of whether that is true or not. If it is or isn’t true, this places truth virtuously higher than love, at least in some sense. The fact that I can question love through the lens of truth seems to place truth above love in height of virtue. On the other hand, if I said that truth is the highest virtue, then it seems that it would be loving to tell others the truth! Perhaps truth and love go hand in hand, but this also concerns the nature of what truth is. Truth is a requirement for love, which I argue here , but is love a requirement for truth? Love must contain truth in order to be true love. But truth does not have to contain love in order to be true truth. Take for instance, mathematics, or numbers in general… Sometimes, t...

Self-tests of Some of the World's Religions

It is fairly common for a religion of the world to give itself a sort of test for truth, since this is one question that is asked of any religion: “Why should I believe what you are telling me is true?” After all, the answer to such a question will ultimately result in followers of specific beliefs and doctrines, let alone religions, or will result in a lack of followers. If a religion can answer this question posed by seekers and thinkers, and therefore train its adherents to be able to answer why a religion is true, this will inevitably help people believe in such, even if the claims are false. If there is no answer, this is where a religion will perhaps find more trouble for itself. Many religions make an appeal to a higher authority, namely, God , for the veracity of their existence and as a result, no one can question the truth from such an authority. This is correct in a sense, that if in fact God is making such a claim, then what is said or stated is true ...

The Dividing Line of Doctrine

How and Where to Make Divisions... Sometimes, I get asked “Why do you get so up at arms about other religions?” or, “Why do you pick on other religions so much?” I think the following will help you see where I’m coming from, before I spill the beans on such. We have difficulty sometimes in discovering where to make divisions when considering where to spend our money, and who to support, where to make purchases, and where not to do such. We also often have difficulty on how to know if a church or a congregation is a place where someone can actually become saved. Like, how can we know that a Mormon is likely not saved but we can know that a regular church attender at a gospel sound church is likely saved? What is it that would make my church attendance at a specific body no longer appropriate? Both answers to these questions deal with doctrine. If a company is pushing false doctrine using their influence and power to push a heretical doctrine or teaching, this is often when the red...

Who Made God? Identifying Categorical Errors

A category is simply a distinct class to which something belongs… A set of objects that can be treated as equal in some way. A Macintosh apple belongs to the category, apple, and not what we categorize as an orange. Similarly, colors are in a different category than taste. When we say, “apples and oranges” what we mean is that there has been a confusion of categories. Sure, they are both fruit, but when you examine both, there is an obvious difference. An apple is not an orange, and an orange is not an apple. Macintosh, Granny Smith, and red delicious are all apples. Navel, blood, and Valencia are all oranges. To mix the two, for instance, to call a navel orange an apple, would be a categorical error, sometimes referred to as a category mistake. How Identifying Categorical Errors can Help with Apologetics It seems that simply learning about or being reminded of categorical errors can help us be more aware of them. We have all heard or thought of ourselves, the...

Two Problems Jesus has with the Mormon Doctrine of Eternal Families

Mormonism teaches that those who are married in a temple can be married for eternity. In Doctrine and Covenants 132:15–20, we find the following: 15 Therefore, if a man marry him a wife in the world, and he marry her not by me nor by my word , and he covenant with her so long as he is in the world and she with him, their covenant and marriage are not of force when they are dead , and when they are out of the world; therefore, they are not bound by any law when they are out of the world. 16 Therefore, when they are out of the world they neither marry nor are given in marriage; but are appointed angels in heaven, which angels are ministering servants, to minister for those who are worthy of a far more, and an exceeding, and an eternal weight of glory. 17 For these angels did not abide my law; therefore, they cannot be enlarged, but remain separately and singly, without exaltation, in their saved condition, to all eternity; and from henceforth are not gods, but are angels of God for...

Using Guilt to Guide to the Truth

While taking a cultural apologetics class in my doctorate, I rambled along in a 30-page paper and in it, I wrote that, “I define religion as an anthropological system consisting of worship which is often filled with specific sacred rituals that seeks to appease or eradicate guilt.” My professor red-penned this and said that I am not yet in an authoritative position to make such definitions. But I was never asked how I came up with such a definition. The thing is, working on my second post-graduate degree in apologetics, studying many other religions on a deeper level was inevitable, and by this, I noticed a pattern in all of them which was the fact that they all seek to appease or eradicate guilt, including Buddhism , even though many adherents of Buddhism claim that it is not a religion . The point is that all religions seek to eradicate guilt on some level, because guilt crosses all cultures and times, to all people . Guilt transcends all people. The ...

Baptism is Not Necessary for Salvation According to the Early Church

Let’s dive right in. The Bible says in Acts 2:37-41, Now when they heard this they were cut to the heart, and said to Peter and the rest of the apostles, “Brothers, what shall we do?” And Peter said to them, “Repent and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins, and you will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit. For the promise is for you and for your children and for all who are far off, everyone whom the Lord our God calls to himself.” And with many other words he bore witness and continued to exhort them, saying, “Save yourselves from this crooked generation.” So those who received his word were baptized, and there were added that day about three thousand souls. The phrase in Acts 2:38 that reads, “for the forgiveness of your sins” modifies the word repentance, not the word baptism. See more about this Here . What is interesting is that those who translate the above verse as meaning that baptism is a requ...

The Evidence and Power of Testimony

What to say to People who Demand more Evidence for God. Why is there something rather than nothing? Glacier National Park. © Nace Howell, 2018. The question is, how much evidence do you require? Would Jesus have to come back and slap you in the face with evidence that He is God? It seems to me that there is a line we must draw. We do this in all other areas of our lives, so why would we treat theism any different? When a court convicts, they do so “beyond a reasonable doubt.” I would like to take a few moments to explore this a bit. But before we get to that, I want to pose a question, which is… why are you the standard? What makes you think He has to prove His existence to everyone individually? He already created the universe from nothing. In the beginning, there was a big bang. Seriously… do you believe your mom when she tells you a story about her day? Did you believe the reports of 9/11 when they were happening? Do you accept the testimony of anything you hear on social ...

Apologetics and Evidence

Search This Blog