Skip to main content

Organized Religion and Ministries and their place through the eyes of the Bible


            At some point, a new believer (or old believer) might consider going to church. The rationale of that person might also taunt him or her into questioning the reliability and credibility of organized religion, or in other words, the question of whether or not church in and of itself is ordained by God. I have often heard it said that organized religion is bad because it teaches people to be what God does not want them to be, or that organized ministries teach that the path to true Christianity is too narrow and does not include Christians that can “come as you are (or, ‘as you were’).”
            Biblically speaking, it is said that we are to encourage one another in the faith and not forsake the fellowship of other believers: “Let us hold unswervingly to the hope we profess, for he who promised is faithful. And let us consider how we may spur one another on toward love and good deeds. Let us not give up meeting together, as some are in the habit of doing, but let us encourage one another—and all the more as you see the Day approaching” (NIV Heb 10:23-25). There are a few key phrases in this passage that directly define the desires of God: spur one another toward love; let us not give up meeting together; and let us encourage one another  (see also 2 Tim. 3:16). These key phrases point to something we will discuss more in depth below.
            As alluded to above, it is believed by some that organized religion or ministries (ORM) will prevent or hinder a person from becoming what God wants him or her to do or become. It seems that there should be a closer consideration of the will of God. If scripture is God breathed and inspired by Him (2 Tim. 3:16) and is something that should be tested (see 1 Thess. 5:21—which speaks of prophecy, but since the Bible is not only prophetic, but also because it is not logical to say, “test something except the thing which advises to test,” then we know that God’s will for us, as His children, is to encourage one another in the faith, because of this passage of scripture found in the book of Hebrews above, along with several other passages to some of which we shall now turn.
            Galatians 6:1-10 explains that if a brother in Christ is caught in sin, that he should be helped by another believer who will not fall into the same trap, and concludes with the idea that believers are supposed to take extra special care for other believers in Christ (those of the household of the faith). What does this mean against the idea that ORM are evil? It means that a person is to be held accountable to other believers, so how then can ORM be evil?
            What if there are a few people that come together and meet up that is not in a church building in order to not “forsake the assembling of others (KJV)?” I must say, that IS church! Church is not a building but it is the entire body of believers of Jesus. If you are meeting together once a week or a few times a week, then good. You are doing well. But if you aren’t doing ANYTHING, then you are disobeying God and “forsaking the fellowship of others,” and you are “giving up meeting together,” which God deliberately commands against.
            In 1 Corinthians 9:20-22, Paul explains that when he is with Jews, those under the Law, those not having the Law, and those who are weak, he becomes like them to witness to them. Then he covers every other category by saying that he becomes all things to all men that he might save some. This passage tells us several things: 1) It says that people are lost or, without Christ and implies the need for salvation; 2) It implies that one way effective witnessing is performed is by lowering oneself or raising oneself to the level of the lost person; 3) it implies that people aren’t perfect, and in a sense, different. There are four specific types of people mentioned in this passage and their range is extreme: Jews to those under the Law. In other words, Jews—to Jews who do not practice Judaism, and do not obey the Law (The Ten Commandments are but ten of the 613 Laws that Jews were to obey. See Exo. 20 and also Deut. 11:1).
            With this in mind, it can be understood that the entire Jewish nation at the time Paul wrote this passage to the Corinthians was comprised of several types of people. These several types of people are what would become the makeup of the church (the body of believers; see Eph. 4:4-6). Since Paul is getting all types of people saved and converted to Christ, then it makes sense that there are all types and levels of spiritual maturity coming to be a part of the body of Christ. What does this all mean? It means that people who go to church vary (sometimes greatly) in spiritual maturity. ORM is then comprised of diverse groups of people... including people who are not perfect, and people who will sin against God by mistreating those He loves (Eph. 4:29-32). Therefore, when it comes to ORM, remember that it is consists of people who are of all types of spiritual maturity and that they may need someone like you to mentor them for spiritual growth. In the same manner, knowing that there are all kinds of people who go to church, people are not judged for their appearances (like some people have believed in the past) because wisdom comes in many forms (See James 1:5 and Proverbs 12:15, these verses apply to all types and looks of people). Knowing all of this, the pastor is not the only person in the church building from whom one learns.
            Proverbs 27:17, “as iron sharpens iron, so one man sharpens another,” makes it clear that not only are people capable of encouraging other people, but also that people are encouraged by other people. The difference is in the direction of focus. One focuses on giving encouragement (subject A), and the other focuses on receiving encouragement (subject B). It seems that one word would sum up this scenario: Relationships (one connection between subjects A and B). This is what God desires for His people... to have healthy, encouraging and uplifting relationships with each other! It is an ingredient to spiritual maturity.
            Paul shows this in much of his writing. Such as, 1 Cor. 13:1, where Paul says, “If I have the tongues of men and of angels, but have not love, I am nothing.” See, what is going on here is the Corinthians at the time believed in this pagan “angelic” practice which consisted of people speaking gibberish and claiming that it was the “language of angels” Paul was not condoning their pagan actions, but he was “becoming like them” in order to witness to them as he tells people to do in 1 Cor. 9:20-22.
            There is another window to this idea as well which is found in Acts 17: “Paul then stood up in the meeting of the Areopagus and said: “Men of Athens! I see that in every way you are very religious. For as I walked around and looked carefully at your objects of worship, I even found an altar with this inscription: to an unknown god. Now what you worship as something unknown I am going to proclaim to you...” (NIV Ac 17:22-23). Here, Paul is not only putting himself on the same level as the men of Athens, but he is also encouraging them by commending them for their intelligence—which seems to be a good way to witness to these types of people because their pride is clearly in their wisdom. Relationships that uplift others in Christ are the will of God (see Matthew 28:19-20); accountability from wise, godly people brings spiritual maturity.
            2 Timothy 4:2 is a command to “Preach the Word; be prepared in season and out of season; correct, rebuke and encourage—with great patience and careful instruction” (NIV 2 Ti 4:2). What does it mean to “be prepared?” Preparation to “preach the Word” is the ability to “correct, rebuke, and encourage.” In other words, we must well know and understand that which we are defending—the Bible—and be ready to do so in all seasons (or, at all times). Not only is this another ingredient to spiritual maturity, but being prepared is a requirement for some. A trained, biblical scholar is easily found and is free of charge to learn from—a pastor at your local church. Remember, as made clear above, the pastor is also a part of the body of Christ, who is also an imperfect human. He is the messenger of a message from God. The message he gives is also a message to him.
            “With great patience and careful instruction” is the relationship part of this command. Its desire is for the readers to understand that love is required to successfully correct, rebuke and encourage. Love is obviously a notable aspect in relationships. Reading through the Bible, one continuously sees commands and encouragement to love one another.
            With these things in mind, know that it is your freedom to go to any church you please. You can go to one church and if you do not like it, then go to another one. As long as the church preaches sound, biblical doctrine that correctly points to salvation through Jesus Christ (read Galatians 1:6-9; Romans 10:9; 2 Corinthians 5:17: Ephesians 2:8-9; et.al., I suggest giving a church at least three services before you make a decision. If you are concerned that the church is told by the government about what it says (which I have heard this excuse before), then maybe it is up to you to let them as an ORM know that in America, this goes against the First Amendment of the Bill of Rights: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.” In other words, the pastor or anyone in the church is free to say whatever is desired (but should obviously be encouraged to correct interpretation of scripture). This is exactly why biblical training is necessary. The revelation that God has for His people—the Bible—is not always easily understood when reading through its pages.
            There are several things to consider when preaching from the Bible, such as the 1) Historical Background. This is what the cultural setting was at the time of the writing of the biblical book. Another thing to consider is 2) the Occasion for Writing, which is that which prompts the author to write the book. 3) The author’s purpose of writing is what the author wanted the readers of the letter to know in order to change or be enlightened, etc. The context of the book, such as 4) the remote context, which is the entire scope of the book; 5) the near context, which is the context of the passage in the remote context or the book (or letter) itself; and finally, 6) the immediate context, which is the sentence in perspective, must also be taken into consideration. These are but a few things to understand when preaching from the Bible. The list goes on with figures of speech, meaning of words, literary genre, and even the breaking down of parables, epistles, etc., etc., etc. This is precisely why a preacher must have training. In training, he is not always told the meaning of the scripture, but he is told how to find the meaning of the scripture himself through the process of hermeneutics, in which some of these processes are listed immediately above. So, in other words, in seminary the preacher learns how to fish, he is not necessarily given the fish. In any event, biblical training and building relationships are two of the many benefits of church.
            The brother of James—the half brother of Christ—knew the importance of being able to defend the truth. He wrote to his audience, “I felt I had to write and urge you to contend for the faith” (NIV Jude 3). What comes to mind when you hear the word, “contend?” I personally think of the word contender, which, in my mind is a boxer. For the swinging fists that may bring danger, the best thing to do would be to end this danger. In other words, KO. So then, Jude is urging his readers to defend the faith, not only in defense, but in offense as well. In order to do this, one must have a clear understanding of the subject at hand.
            Having seemed to exhaust the idea that a person needs to go to church in order to receive biblical training and to build relationships that encourage and educate (or spur, if you prefer) toward spiritual maturity, we now conclude with something that seems so simple, yet is encouraging in itself, as well as uplifting, comforting, educating, need filling, remarkable and beautiful: Jesus promises that he will be there with you... “For where two or three come together in my name, there am I with them” (NIV Mt 18:20). Therefore I urge you and pray that you who read this will seek Him by gathering together in His name.




Written by Nace Howell through the grace of the Lord Jesus

© Nace Howell, 2022





Works Cited
            The Holy Bible: New International Version, electronic ed. (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1996, c1984).

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How to Show a Mormon the Difference Between the Mormon Jesus and the Biblical Jesus

I find that Mormons frequently claim they are Christians, and that they want to be referred to as Christians, and they have even recently sought to distance themselves from the word “Mormon.” The problem is, they worship another Jesus, and here is how to show them the difference between the Mormon Jesus and the Biblical Jesus. Before we get to that, some clarifications are necessary.   The Mormon President Russell Nelson said,    “What’s in a name or, in this case, a nickname? When it comes to nicknames of the Church, such as the “LDS Church,” the “Mormon Church,” or the “Church of the Latter-day Saints,” the most important thing in those names is the absence of the Savior’s name. To remove the Lord’s name from the Lord’s Church is a major victory for Satan. When we discard the Savior’s name, we are subtly disregarding all that Jesus Christ did for us—even His Atonement.” [1]   So, according to Nelson, to call Mormons,  Mormons , is a victory for Satan. So, this also means that to call

Joseph Smith had the same Demon that influenced Muhammad

What does Islam have in common with Mormonism? Seriously, the similarities are uncanny. Like human beings, demons are creatures of habit . The Bible does not tell us much about them, but from what it does tell us, we can learn a lot. Jesus reveals to us some things about their behavior: When the unclean spirit has gone out of a person, it passes through waterless places seeking rest, but finds none. Then it says, ‘I will return to my house from which I came.’ And when it comes, it finds the house empty, swept, and put in order. Then it goes and brings with it seven other spirits more evil than itself, and they enter and dwell there, and the last state of that person is worse than the first… [1]   Jesus clearly knows that demons have typical behaviors. He has seen it many times before. He lets us know that a typical behavior for a demon is that home is where the heart is . When your house crumbles to the ground, you move to a new one. Likewise, when a person dies, the demon is f

The Two Systems: A Confused Definition of Love

A couple years ago I wrote an article called  the Jehovah’s Witness training videos . The article was meant to be humorous in a sense, because there are likely not any actual training videos, but it seems that they have all watched them. We can suspect this because they all often have the same points of conversation. When you talk about the Trinity, they will use the Bible like a machine gun and shoot you with verses. The verses are always the same: Colossians 1:15, Mark 10:18… So, there is an implication that they all have the same information. There is one source from where they gather their patterns and behaviors. Similarly, I think we can see the power behind the system of the world as well. We can see what this power is like by the tracks he leaves behind. The contrast of the two systems is really seen in Revelation 14:8. “Fallen, fallen is Babylon the great, she who made all nations drink the wine of the passion of her sexual immorality.” John is using the word  Babylon  here for

How and Where to Make Divisions

Sometimes, I get asked “Why do you get so up at arms about other religions?” or, “Why do you pick on other religions so much?” I think the following will help you see where I’m coming from, before I spill the beans on such.   We have difficulty sometimes in discovering where to make divisions when considering where to spend our money, and who to support, where to make purchases, and where not to do such. We also often have difficulty on how to know if a church or a congregation is a place where someone can actually become saved. Like, how can we know that a Mormon is likely not saved but we can know that a regular church attender at a gospel sound church is likely saved? What is it that would make my church attendance at a specific body no longer appropriate? Both answers to these questions deal with doctrine. If a company is pushing false doctrine using their influence and power to push a heretical doctrine or teaching, this is often when the red flags fly. “Non-essentials” aside for

The Highest Virtue

A virtue is a trait of excellence. What is the highest virtue? It seems that based on the nature of truth, that truth itself is perhaps the highest virtue. For instance, I could say that love is the highest virtue, but then I could ask the question of whether that is true or not. If it is or isn’t true, this places truth virtuously higher than love, at least in some sense. The fact that I can question love through the lens of truth seems to place truth above love in height of virtue. On the other hand, if I said that truth is the highest virtue, then it seems that it would be loving to tell others the truth! Perhaps truth and love go hand in hand, but this also concerns the nature of what truth is.  Truth is a requirement for love, which I argue here , but is love a requirement for truth? Love must contain truth in order to be  true  love. But truth does not have to contain love in order to be true truth. Take for instance, mathematics, or numbers in general… Sometimes, the truth hurts

Defending Christianity against Mormonism

“But in your hearts set apart Christ as Lord. Always be prepared to give an answer to everyone who asks you to give the reason for the hope that you have. But do this with gentleness and respect ” (NIV 1 Peter 3:15). In other words, LOVE THEM . Mormons                                                             Biblical Truths Mormons are monolaters, meaning, they believe in many gods, yet worship only one. LDS believe that “As man is, God once was; and as God is, man may become.” LDS do not believe in Hell. LDS believe God is flesh and bones. LDS believe in baptism for the dead. LDS believe Jesus and Satan are created brothers. LDS do not believe in the Trinity. LDS believe that “it is by grace we are saved, after all we can do” (Nephi 25:23). Deuteronomy 6:4 says, “Hear, O Israel: The Lord our God, the Lord is one” (See also Isaiah 43:11; Acts 5:4; 1 Timothy 2:5; Exodus 20:3; et. al.). God kn

Objectivity is the Language of Heaven

NDErs (i. e. people who have claimed to have had a   Near Death Experience ) often report that when they go to Heaven, they frequently see and recognize people such as friends and family members. It is often also reported that when they were communicating with friends and relatives, they realized that they weren’t speaking English, but that they were telepathically speaking to one another.   It seems it would be impossible to have communication with others without learning every language that has ever existed under the sun, but since heaven is a perfect place, [1]  then communication should be perfect as well. In other words, it seems unlikely that there are barriers to communication. So, I should be able to communicate with the Apostles, upon my arrival for instance, but how? I personally only really know how to speak English fluently. My Spanish, Japanese, German, Russian, Chinese, and Latin is like that of a child, and my Greek is only in reading and writing.  If communication is me

Argument from Beauty: Evangelical Christians have Neglected a Favorable Catalyst for the Gospel

It seems to me that some Evangelical Christians have taken a biblical passage in the wrong direction. Perhaps I, considering myself to be an Evangelical Christian, am guilty of such as well. Romans 12:1-2 says, “I appeal to you therefore, brothers, by the mercies of God, to present your bodies as a living sacrifice, holy and acceptable to God, which is your spiritual worship. Do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewal of your mind, that by testing you may discern what is the will of God, what is good and acceptable and perfect.”  Verse 2 is where we get the phrase,  be in the world, but don’t be of the world . What this means is that we should know our place. Our place is in heaven. The Bible says that we are citizens of heaven, and that we should think and act as if we are. Philippians 3:20-21 says, “But our citizenship is in heaven, and from it we await a Savior, the Lord Jesus Christ, who will transform our lowly body to be like his glorious body, by the po

The Evidence and Power of Testimony

What to say to People who Demand more Evidence for God. Why is there something rather than nothing? Glacier National Park. © Nace Howell, 2018. The question is, how much evidence do you require? Would Jesus have to come back and slap you in the face with evidence that He is God? It seems to me that there is a line we must draw. We do this in all other areas of our lives, so why would we treat theism any different? When a court convicts, they do so “beyond a reasonable doubt.” I would like to take a few moments to explore this a bit. But before we get to that, I want to pose a question, which is… why are you the standard? What makes you think He has to prove His existence to everyone individually? He already created the universe from nothing. In the beginning, there was a big bang. Seriously… do you believe your mom when she tells you a story about her day? Did you believe the reports of 9/11 when they were happening? Do you accept the testimony of anything you hear on social

Does Baptism Save People from Sin?

There is a lot of confusion, and I would go as far to say that there is a perversion, of baptism in the world today. Some people, such as those in the Church of Christ, teach that baptism is a requirement for salvation. Others say that baptism is something we can do for the dead . But what does the Bible teach about baptism?   Those who say that baptism is a requirement for salvation use verses like 1 Peter 3:21 which says,  baptism which corresponds to this now saves you, not as a removal of dirt from the body but as an appeal to God for a good conscience through the resurrection of Christ Jesus…  This is not talking about soul salvation but being saved from one’s own bad conscience. In other words, by obeying Jesus in getting baptized, we have a good conscience in doing so. Other times some  people  may use Acts 2:37-38 to show that baptism is a requirement for salvation.  Now when they heard this they were cut to the heart, and said to Peter and the rest of the apostles, “Brothers,