Skip to main content

The Dividing Line of Doctrine

How and Where to Make Divisions...

Sometimes, I get asked “Why do you get so up at arms about other religions?” or, “Why do you pick on other religions so much?” I think the following will help you see where I’m coming from, before I spill the beans on such. 

We have difficulty sometimes in discovering where to make divisions when considering where to spend our money, and who to support, where to make purchases, and where not to do such. We also often have difficulty on how to know if a church or a congregation is a place where someone can actually become saved. Like, how can we know that a Mormon is likely not saved but we can know that a regular church attender at a gospel sound church is likely saved? What is it that would make my church attendance at a specific body no longer appropriate?

Both answers to these questions deal with doctrine. If a company is pushing false doctrine using their influence and power to push a heretical doctrine or teaching, this is often when the red flags fly. “Non-essentials” aside for now, the question is where do we draw the line. I think that the Bible calls us to make certain divisions, which we will also get to in a moment.

Similarly, when a religious organization has doctrines that are heretical, then a person who claims to be a part of that organization and follows the doctrines therein, then if those doctrines are false according to scripture and Christian doctrine, then it can rightly be argued that such a person is not saved. 

If the doctrines within an organization are false, and a person is under that organization and believes the things they teach, then there is a major problem. 

Consider Matthew 7:15-23, which says, 


“Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheep's clothing but inwardly are ravenous wolves. 16 You will recognize them by their fruits. Are grapes gathered from thornbushes, or figs from thistles? 17 So, every healthy tree bears good fruit, but the diseased tree bears bad fruit. 18 A healthy tree cannot bear bad fruit, nor can a diseased tree bear good fruit. 19 Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire. 20 Thus you will recognize them by their fruits.

21 “Not everyone who says to me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of heaven, but the one who does the will of my Father who is in heaven. 22 On that day many will say to me, ‘Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name, and cast out demons in your name, and do many mighty works in your name?’ 23 And then will I declare to them, ‘I never knew you; depart from me, you workers of lawlessness.’


This passage should be quite sobering. Whatever a church teaches must come under one of two things… that which is essential or non-essential. Essential to salvation or non-essential to salvation.

Why should we beware of false prophets? What is Jesus saying in this passage? What does a false prophet teach? A false gospel! Jesus is implying this is the text above. “Beware of false prophets who come to you in sheep’s clothing…” what they teach sounds very attractive. But inwardly they are like snarling wolves. He says that you will recognizing them by their fruits. The question is, are we examining their fruit closely enough? 

I think this all boils down to doctrine. If we have a false prophet teaching a false doctrine or a false gospel, what does this amount to? Remember what Jesus says… “Not everyone who says to me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of heaven, but the one who does the will of my Father who is in heaven. On that day many will say to me, ‘Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name, and cast out demons in your name, and do many mighty works in your name?’ And then will I declare to them, ‘I never knew you; depart from me, you workers of lawlessness.’

A false prophet bringing a false doctrine or false teaching will result (according to Jesus) in a false salvation. “I never knew you; depart from me…” This is why doctrine is so important. Doctrine and teaching is the dividing line. This is just another reason we cannot just read the Bible superficially. We need to be textual archaeologists and excavate the text. We should always seek to know what it means. 

If you are in an organization that teaches a false doctrine, and adhere to those doctrines, then you have a false salvation. Think of it like this: False prophets + False gospel = False salvation. When it comes to false prophets and teachers, the Bible is acutely aware of it based on how often it tells us to stand firm and be on our guard. 

What is a false gospel? Anything that is different than what we see in the Bible. This would be every other religion apart from Christianity. What is the Law of Non-contradiction? Something cannot be both true and false at the same time and in the same sense. Keep Galatians 1:6-8 in mind and take notice my emphasis…


 “I am astonished that you are so quickly deserting him who called you in the grace of Christ and are turning to a different gospel— 7 not that there is another one, but there are some who trouble you and want to distort the gospel of Christ. 8 But even if we or an angel from heaven should preach to you a gospel contrary to the one we preached to you, let him be accursed. 9 As we have said before, so now I say again: If anyone is preaching to you a gospel contrary to the one you received, let him be accursed.”


If you thought you were in the clear because you are not a false prophet, but are just a simpleton under the false prophet, Jesus says to you as well, “I never knew you; depart from me…” It is not just the false prophet, but it is also those who were under the false prophet. A false gospel is anything that contradicts the gospel that we find in the Bible. It seems that “works” is the one dividing line that is most blatant and most clear that is contrary from one gospel to the next, though there is no other gospel. Which is what Galatians is about. Galatians is an apologetic against a false gospel of works. Paul is speaking chronologically, in that the Galatians have already grabbed on to the true gospel (Galatians 1:6), but he is astonished that they are so quickly turning from it. He is astonished that they are trying to add works to their salvation. 

Again, Paul says, “I am astonished that you are so quickly deserting him who called you in the grace of Christ and are turning to a different gospel—not that there is another one, but there are some who trouble you and want to distort the gospel of Christ” (Galatians 1:6-7).

John says, “The Law came through Moses, but grace and truth came through Jesus Christ.” We are set free! This is why Paul is losing his mind here… He says, “I am astonished that you are so quickly deserting him who called you in the grace of Christ and are turning to a different gospel…” 

What manner of “contrary” is Paul talking about in Galatians? I would say that it is the dividing line is between works and grace. The reason for this is because Galatians is all about circumcision, respectively. The issue in Galatians 1:6-9 is that the Galatians have been suckered into believing by the Judaizers that circumcision is a requirement for salvation. But Paul corrects them. He was acutely aware of true salvation that sets a person free. 

He knew that our salvation produces works, and that our works do not produce our salvation. 2 Corinthians 5:17 says that “If anyone is in Christ, he is a new creation. Old things have passed away and behold, all things have become like new.” Completely new! So new that the way you see yourself as well as other people will completely change. Not only do we not have to earn our salvation, but we couldn’t if we tried. The Bible says that all have sinned and fall short of God’s glory, and as sinners we are unable to lift ourselves up by our own bootstraps. We need the life-saving grace of Jesus.

The Dividing Line Between Works-based Salvation and Grace-based Salvation is Doctrine 

Jehovah’ Witnesses, for instance, teach that Jesus is Michael the archangel. They teach that the nature of Jesus is not deity, that He is not God in the flesh. The question here should be, is such a Jesus sufficient for salvation? 2 Corinthians 11:4 teaches that there are “other Jesus’s” and people put up with them readily enough. But it seems that a Jesus that is not divine is an insufficient savior. Should we put up with such a teaching about Jesus? Certainly not! Jehovah’s Witnesses teach a false nature about of Jesus, a false doctrine. Their Jesus is fundamentally different that the Biblical Jesus and is insufficient for salvation. He is insufficient because He is not God, so how could He forgive anyone’s sin? If they say that He is not really a human being, then how could He be the perfect sacrifice? The answer is that The Jehovah’s Witness Jesus is a false Jesus, and anyone who believes in such a Jesus will find themselves in the same boat as those to whom Jesus says, “Depart from me; I never knew you…”

Sometimes I get asked “Why do you get so up at arms about other religions?” The reason is because they amount to a false salvation. This means that there will be people who will not be in heaven, as sad as that is, because they did not have true faith, they didn’t have the one, true Jesus “take away their sin” (see John 1:29).


Written by Nace Howell through the grace of the Lord Jesus

© Nace Howell, 2023


Popular posts from this blog

How to Show a Mormon the Difference Between the Mormon Jesus and the Biblical Jesus

I find that Mormons frequently claim they are Christians, and that they want to be referred to as Christians, and they have even recently sought to distance themselves from the word “Mormon.” The problem is, they worship another Jesus, and here is how to show them the difference between the Mormon Jesus and the Biblical Jesus. Before we get to that, some clarifications are necessary.   The Mormon President Russell Nelson said,    “What’s in a name or, in this case, a nickname? When it comes to nicknames of the Church, such as the “LDS Church,” the “Mormon Church,” or the “Church of the Latter-day Saints,” the most important thing in those names is the absence of the Savior’s name. To remove the Lord’s name from the Lord’s Church is a major victory for Satan. When we discard the Savior’s name, we are subtly disregarding all that Jesus Christ did for us—even His Atonement.” [1]   So, according to Nelson, to call Mormons,  Mormons , is a victory for Satan. So, this also means that to call

Joseph Smith had the same Demon that influenced Muhammad

What does Islam have in common with Mormonism? Seriously, the similarities are uncanny. Like human beings, demons are creatures of habit . The Bible does not tell us much about them, but from what it does tell us, we can learn a lot. Jesus reveals to us some things about their behavior: When the unclean spirit has gone out of a person, it passes through waterless places seeking rest, but finds none. Then it says, ‘I will return to my house from which I came.’ And when it comes, it finds the house empty, swept, and put in order. Then it goes and brings with it seven other spirits more evil than itself, and they enter and dwell there, and the last state of that person is worse than the first… [1]   Jesus clearly knows that demons have typical behaviors. He has seen it many times before. He lets us know that a typical behavior for a demon is that home is where the heart is . When your house crumbles to the ground, you move to a new one. Likewise, when a person dies, the demon is f

The Two Systems: A Confused Definition of Love

A couple years ago I wrote an article called  the Jehovah’s Witness training videos . The article was meant to be humorous in a sense, because there are likely not any actual training videos, but it seems that they have all watched them. We can suspect this because they all often have the same points of conversation. When you talk about the Trinity, they will use the Bible like a machine gun and shoot you with verses. The verses are always the same: Colossians 1:15, Mark 10:18… So, there is an implication that they all have the same information. There is one source from where they gather their patterns and behaviors. Similarly, I think we can see the power behind the system of the world as well. We can see what this power is like by the tracks he leaves behind. The contrast of the two systems is really seen in Revelation 14:8. “Fallen, fallen is Babylon the great, she who made all nations drink the wine of the passion of her sexual immorality.” John is using the word  Babylon  here for

The Highest Virtue

A virtue is a trait of excellence. What is the highest virtue? It seems that based on the nature of truth, that truth itself is perhaps the highest virtue. For instance, I could say that love is the highest virtue, but then I could ask the question of whether that is true or not. If it is or isn’t true, this places truth virtuously higher than love, at least in some sense. The fact that I can question love through the lens of truth seems to place truth above love in height of virtue. On the other hand, if I said that truth is the highest virtue, then it seems that it would be loving to tell others the truth! Perhaps truth and love go hand in hand, but this also concerns the nature of what truth is.  Truth is a requirement for love, which I argue here , but is love a requirement for truth? Love must contain truth in order to be  true  love. But truth does not have to contain love in order to be true truth. Take for instance, mathematics, or numbers in general… Sometimes, the truth hurts

Objectivity is the Language of Heaven

NDErs (i. e. people who have claimed to have had a   Near Death Experience ) often report that when they go to Heaven, they frequently see and recognize people such as friends and family members. It is often also reported that when they were communicating with friends and relatives, they realized that they weren’t speaking English, but that they were telepathically speaking to one another.   It seems it would be impossible to have communication with others without learning every language that has ever existed under the sun, but since heaven is a perfect place, [1]  then communication should be perfect as well. In other words, it seems unlikely that there are barriers to communication. So, I should be able to communicate with the Apostles, upon my arrival for instance, but how? I personally only really know how to speak English fluently. My Spanish, Japanese, German, Russian, Chinese, and Latin is like that of a child, and my Greek is only in reading and writing.  If communication is me

Defending Christianity against Mormonism

“But in your hearts set apart Christ as Lord. Always be prepared to give an answer to everyone who asks you to give the reason for the hope that you have. But do this with gentleness and respect ” (NIV 1 Peter 3:15). In other words, LOVE THEM . Mormons                                                             Biblical Truths Mormons are monolaters, meaning, they believe in many gods, yet worship only one. LDS believe that “As man is, God once was; and as God is, man may become.” LDS do not believe in Hell. LDS believe God is flesh and bones. LDS believe in baptism for the dead. LDS believe Jesus and Satan are created brothers. LDS do not believe in the Trinity. LDS believe that “it is by grace we are saved, after all we can do” (Nephi 25:23). Deuteronomy 6:4 says, “Hear, O Israel: The Lord our God, the Lord is one” (See also Isaiah 43:11; Acts 5:4; 1 Timothy 2:5; Exodus 20:3; et. al.). God kn

The Evidence and Power of Testimony

What to say to People who Demand more Evidence for God. Why is there something rather than nothing? Glacier National Park. © Nace Howell, 2018. The question is, how much evidence do you require? Would Jesus have to come back and slap you in the face with evidence that He is God? It seems to me that there is a line we must draw. We do this in all other areas of our lives, so why would we treat theism any different? When a court convicts, they do so “beyond a reasonable doubt.” I would like to take a few moments to explore this a bit. But before we get to that, I want to pose a question, which is… why are you the standard? What makes you think He has to prove His existence to everyone individually? He already created the universe from nothing. In the beginning, there was a big bang. Seriously… do you believe your mom when she tells you a story about her day? Did you believe the reports of 9/11 when they were happening? Do you accept the testimony of anything you hear on social

Does Baptism Save People from Sin?

There is a lot of confusion, and I would go as far to say that there is a perversion, of baptism in the world today. Some people, such as those in the Church of Christ, teach that baptism is a requirement for salvation. Others say that baptism is something we can do for the dead . But what does the Bible teach about baptism?   Those who say that baptism is a requirement for salvation use verses like 1 Peter 3:21 which says,  baptism which corresponds to this now saves you, not as a removal of dirt from the body but as an appeal to God for a good conscience through the resurrection of Christ Jesus…  This is not talking about soul salvation but being saved from one’s own bad conscience. In other words, by obeying Jesus in getting baptized, we have a good conscience in doing so. Other times some  people  may use Acts 2:37-38 to show that baptism is a requirement for salvation.  Now when they heard this they were cut to the heart, and said to Peter and the rest of the apostles, “Brothers,

Argument from Beauty: Evangelical Christians have Neglected a Favorable Catalyst for the Gospel

It seems to me that some Evangelical Christians have taken a biblical passage in the wrong direction. Perhaps I, considering myself to be an Evangelical Christian, am guilty of such as well. Romans 12:1-2 says, “I appeal to you therefore, brothers, by the mercies of God, to present your bodies as a living sacrifice, holy and acceptable to God, which is your spiritual worship. Do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewal of your mind, that by testing you may discern what is the will of God, what is good and acceptable and perfect.”  Verse 2 is where we get the phrase,  be in the world, but don’t be of the world . What this means is that we should know our place. Our place is in heaven. The Bible says that we are citizens of heaven, and that we should think and act as if we are. Philippians 3:20-21 says, “But our citizenship is in heaven, and from it we await a Savior, the Lord Jesus Christ, who will transform our lowly body to be like his glorious body, by the po