A Spiritual Safari

“There is iphone, and then there is everything else.” –That seems to be the understanding that people at Apple want you to believe. Even looking through the Apple website, one gets the feeling that those who own an iphone are the kings and queens of the world. If you don’t own one, all it takes is for you to buy one and you will become the best of the best.

It seems that the goal is to make phones nowadays as thin as a communion wafer, with a screen surface as wide and long as a book cover, having the brilliance of something more sparkly than a tactical flashlight shining through the Hope Diamond. Better resolution is always a good thing, but it seems that the thinner they get, the more fragile they get. Other companies have the same idea, which is why they make a protective case called the Otter Box, or a company called Lifeproof, which even makes a case that allows a phone to float. These cases definitely make cell phones considerably thicker, and it seems that most people put at least some kind of case on them.

I suppose it makes sense to put protective cases around things we cherish or for things which we paid tons of money. Protection is something that people consider a high priority, pretty much about everything. Our houses and cars have locks on them, people have leashes on their dogs (and some have them on their kids), we have airbags, life vests, safety harnesses, hardhats, reflective jogging vests, Kevlar motorcycle helmets, seat belts, life rafts, and I’m positive that you could think of several more on your own.

All of this protection is good, but, what about protection for our hearts? Sure, we have the rib cage which is a strong structure that protects not only our heart, but nearly all of our other organs as well. We also have an epidermis (skin), which protects our hearts. I guess if you really wanted to, you could argue that the diaphragm somehow protects the heart, but this isn’t what I mean. I’m talking about protecting the core of your being. Your heart!

Proverbs 4:23 tells us that above all else, we should protect our hearts because they are the wellsprings of life; the sources of life. The heart reflects our words and actions. In other words, we are living day to day the way we do, because of what is in our core. Our values influence our everyday activities. Jesus says, “The good man brings good things out of the good stored up in his heart, and the evil man brings evil things out of the evil stored up in his heart. For out of the overflow of his heart his mouth speaks” (NIV Luke 6:45). It is clear that the heart was something spoken of metaphorically for several millennia. The books of Psalms and Proverbs often speak of the heart in this context (see Psalm 62:4; Psalm 28:3; Proverbs 15:7; Proverbs 23:7; Proverbs 16:1; and an exhaustive amount of others).

The question is, how are we to protect our hearts, and what are we protecting them from? What influences our hearts? I’m sure you have heard the phrase, “garbage in, garbage out.” As silly as it may seem, there is great truth to it. Psychologically speaking, throughout all our lives, we have learned from modeling. If you have ever worked with or have or had young children, you know that you can do something silly and they will do the same thing. How can we possibly believe that we lose this mimicking characteristic as we get older? The thing is, we can’t. Modeling is everywhere, especially in media. How do fashionable fads exist? These fads are modeled. It seems that once a cell phone decided to go thin, they all did. One advantage (though it is often a disadvantage) we have as adults over children is that we can choose who or what influences us.

We absolutely cannot underestimate the power of influence. What we allow ourselves to soak up through the five senses has powerful influence over our lives. 1 Peter 1:14-16 commands us “As obedient children, do not conform to the evil desires you had when you lived in ignorance. But just as he who called you is holy, so be holy in all you do; for it is written: “Be holy, because I am holy.” Therefore, we ought to constantly work toward holiness,

“making every effort to add to [our] faith goodness; and to goodness, knowledge; and to knowledge, self-control; and to self-control, perseverance; and to perseverance, godliness; and to godliness, mutual affection; and to mutual affection, love. For if you possess these qualities in increasing measure, they will keep you from being ineffective and unproductive in your knowledge of our Lord Jesus Christ” (NIV 2 Peter 1:5-8).

To protect our hearts is to not allow things to penetrate them that will cause us to become further away from God. Sometimes it is obvious, the things that hinder our growth in the Lord. I’m not sure if there is a show that exists on MTV which is actually beneficial to the psyche of any human being. It seems that movie producers think they have to put large amounts of sex or violence in them in order to make big money. Through the internet, one has access to absolutely anything and everything. These examples are clearly extreme, but what about the things that aren’t so obvious or extreme? Just because it might not be sinful, doesn’t mean it is not a hindrance. Several commercials on television would definitely cause our forefathers to roll over in their graves. Sometimes we get caught up in videogames or certain television shows that make our minds wonder to places they shouldn’t (Philippians 4:8). Sometimes even something as simple as hanging out with the wrong crowd can get us into trouble.

The first Psalm speaks of the power of influence. It explains that the person who doesn’t let themselves be influenced by evil, but instead meditates on the Word and Law of God is blessed (some translations use the word happy): “Blessed is the one who does not walk in step with the wicked or stand in the way that sinners take or sit in the company of mockers, but whose delight is in the law of the Lord, and who meditates on his law day and night” (NIV Psalm 1:1-2). In other words, a person cannot wrongfully influence their heart (which influences outward action) by reading the Bible, but one can only positively influence his or her heart by reading and meditating on God's Word.

Even though we are free to say and do anything we want (though not always completely without consequences), it doesn’t mean it is beneficial to us (1 Cor. 6:12). We must guard our hearts and protect them. Since it appears that we constantly become more desensitized on a daily basis because we are consistently attacked with things that have the ability to penetrate our hearts in a spiritually unhealthy manner, we must remember that our hearts and what we allow into them is in view of God (Psalm 139), who is never desensitized (Romans 2:5).

Not only should we protect our hearts, but we should protect the hearts of others: “If anyone causes one of these little ones—those who believe in me—to stumble, it would be better for them if a large millstone were hung around their neck and they were thrown into the sea” (NIV Mark 9:42). As harsh as that sounds, Jesus clearly wanted to get the point across that He despises this unloving and careless act.

In any event, emphasis is placed on what a priceless object the heart is not only to us, but also to God. Therefore, let us wrap our hearts with goodness, godliness and with a God-glorifying attitude that shines so bright, we influence others in a spiritually healthy manner to seek the protection for their hearts needed to also draw closer in a relationship with God (James 4:7-10).

“Therefore, I urge you, brothers and sisters, in view of God’s mercy, to offer your bodies as a living sacrifice, holy and pleasing to God—this is your true and proper worship. Do not conform to the pattern of this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind. Then you will be able to test and approve what God’s will is—his good, pleasing and perfect will” (NIV Romans 12:1-2).

Written by Nace Howell through the grace of the Lord Jesus

Comments

The Evidence and Power of Testimony: The Apostolic Witness

What to say to People who Demand more Evidence for God. Why is there something rather than nothing? Glacier National Park. © Nace Howell, 2018. The question is, how much evidence do you require? Would Jesus have to come back and slap you in the face with evidence that He is God? It seems to me that there is a line we must draw. We do this in all other areas of our lives, so why would we treat theism any different? When a court convicts, they do so “beyond a reasonable doubt.” I would like to take a few moments to explore this a bit. But before we get to that, I want to pose a question, which is… why are you the standard? What makes you think He has to prove His existence to everyone individually? He already created the universe from nothing. In the beginning, there was a big bang. Seriously… do you believe your mom when she tells you a story about her day? Did you believe the reports of 9/11 when they were happening? Do you accept the testimony of anything you hear on social ...

Baptism is Not Necessary for Salvation According to the Early Church

Let’s dive right in. The Bible says in Acts 2:37-41, Now when they heard this they were cut to the heart, and said to Peter and the rest of the apostles, “Brothers, what shall we do?” And Peter said to them, “Repent and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins, and you will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit. For the promise is for you and for your children and for all who are far off, everyone whom the Lord our God calls to himself.” And with many other words he bore witness and continued to exhort them, saying, “Save yourselves from this crooked generation.” So those who received his word were baptized, and there were added that day about three thousand souls. The phrase in Acts 2:38 that reads, “for the forgiveness of your sins” modifies the word repentance, not the word baptism. See more about this Here . What is interesting is that those who translate the above verse as meaning that baptism is a requ...

Using Guilt to Guide to the Truth

While taking a cultural apologetics class in my doctorate, I rambled along in a 30-page paper and in it, I wrote that, “I define religion as an anthropological system consisting of worship which is often filled with specific sacred rituals that seeks to appease or eradicate guilt.” My professor red-penned this and said that I am not yet in an authoritative position to make such definitions. But I was never asked how I came up with such a definition. The thing is, working on my second post-graduate degree in apologetics, studying many other religions on a deeper level was inevitable, and by this, I noticed a pattern in all of them which was the fact that they all seek to appease or eradicate guilt, including Buddhism , even though many adherents of Buddhism claim that it is not a religion . The point is that all religions seek to eradicate guilt on some level, because guilt crosses all cultures and times, to all people . Guilt transcends all people. The ...

Self-tests of Some of the World's Religions

It is fairly common for a religion of the world to give itself a sort of test for truth, since this is one question that is asked of any religion: “Why should I believe what you are telling me is true?” After all, the answer to such a question will ultimately result in followers of specific beliefs and doctrines, let alone religions, or will result in a lack of followers. If a religion can answer this question posed by seekers and thinkers, and therefore train its adherents to be able to answer why a religion is true, this will inevitably help people believe in such, even if the claims are false. If there is no answer, this is where a religion will perhaps find more trouble for itself. Many religions make an appeal to a higher authority, namely, God , for the veracity of their existence and as a result, no one can question the truth from such an authority. This is correct in a sense, that if in fact God is making such a claim, then what is said or stated is true ...

The God of the Killdozer Operator, Marvin Heemeyer

While working toward becoming an apologist and a pastor, I was a heavy equipment operator. I have over 15 years’ experience in the field, focusing on hydrological restorations (stream bank and river restoration and water dam removals) and site development for building pads (ranging from houses to one million + sq. ft. warehouses). I say this because I want to show where the heart for writing article this came about. Marvin Heemeyer purchased a bulldozer from an auction which was a Komatsu D355A with an operating weight of 97,907 lbs. (this does not include the weight of Heemeyer’s fabricated addition). In the picture above, I am operating a Komatsu D155AX which has an operating weight of 89,300 lbs. (If I remember correctly, we were developing the site for a 550,000 sq. ft. warehouse building pad). Heemeyer then went on a rampage in his armored bulldozer in Granby, CO. I don’t want to go into great details about what led up to Heemeyer doing what he did, nor do I want to go into great ...

Two Problems Jesus has with the Mormon Doctrine of Eternal Families

Mormonism teaches that those who are married in a temple can be married for eternity. In Doctrine and Covenants 132:15–20, we find the following: 15 Therefore, if a man marry him a wife in the world, and he marry her not by me nor by my word , and he covenant with her so long as he is in the world and she with him, their covenant and marriage are not of force when they are dead , and when they are out of the world; therefore, they are not bound by any law when they are out of the world. 16 Therefore, when they are out of the world they neither marry nor are given in marriage; but are appointed angels in heaven, which angels are ministering servants, to minister for those who are worthy of a far more, and an exceeding, and an eternal weight of glory. 17 For these angels did not abide my law; therefore, they cannot be enlarged, but remain separately and singly, without exaltation, in their saved condition, to all eternity; and from henceforth are not gods, but are angels of God for...

An Overlooked Argument Against the Book of Mormon

The Book of Mormon is written in a style of language that was not used by anyone at the time that it was written and published. This style of English is called Early Modern English . This fact is an anachronism that I find to be severely overlooked by those who seek the truth about the Book of Mormon. Many Mormons will instantly write this objection off concerning the veracity of the Book of Mormon, even to the point of saying that such an objection is lazy and pitiful, while not giving any rebuttals worth their weight. I recently insinuated the absurdity of the Book of Mormon by asking the question, “Why was the Book of Mormon translated into Early Modern English?” I’m saying that it is absurd that the BoM uses an out-of-date language. A Mormon replied to me that the Bible has equal absurdities. He said, “Why is [The BoM translation into Early Modern English] absurd? Is it absurd that God uses a donkey to speak to Balaam in Numbers 22?” First, this is a tu quo...

Defending Christianity against Jehovah’s Witnesses

Defending Christianity against Jehovah’s Witnesses Using much of their “bible” to refute them “But in your hearts set apart Christ as Lord. Always be prepared to give an answer to everyone who asks you to give the reason for the hope that you have. But do this with gentleness and respect ” (NIV 1 Peter 3:15). In other words, LOVE THEM . Jehovah’s Witnesses Biblical Truths Jehovah’s Witnesses do not believe in the Trinity. J.Ws. believe that Jesus was a “little god” (lower case g). J.Ws. believe in a different “ Jesus ” because of the NWT accounts. J.Ws. call themselves “Christians.” J.Ws. believe Jesus is not to be worshiped. J.Ws. believe that Jesus was once, and is again, Michael the archangel. Genesis 1:26 says, “Let Us crea...

Who Made God? Identifying Categorical Errors

A category is simply a distinct class to which something belongs… A set of objects that can be treated as equal in some way. A Macintosh apple belongs to the category, apple, and not what we categorize as an orange. Similarly, colors are in a different category than taste. When we say, “apples and oranges” what we mean is that there has been a confusion of categories. Sure, they are both fruit, but when you examine both, there is an obvious difference. An apple is not an orange, and an orange is not an apple. Macintosh, Granny Smith, and red delicious are all apples. Navel, blood, and Valencia are all oranges. To mix the two, for instance, to call a navel orange an apple, would be a categorical error, sometimes referred to as a category mistake. How Identifying Categorical Errors can Help with Apologetics It seems that simply learning about or being reminded of categorical errors can help us be more aware of them. We have all heard or thought of ourselves, the...

How to Show a Mormon the Difference Between the Mormon Jesus and the Biblical Jesus

I find that Mormons frequently claim that they are Christians, and that they want to be referred to as Christians, and that they have even recently sought to distance themselves from the word “Mormon.” The problem is, they worship another Jesus, and here is how to show them the difference between the Mormon Jesus and the Biblical Jesus. Before we get to that, some clarifications are necessary. Specifically, that they cannot even distance themselves from being called "Mormons." The Mormon President Russell Nelson said, “What’s in a name or, in this case, a nickname? When it comes to nicknames of the Church, such as the “LDS Church,” the “Mormon Church,” or the “Church of the Latter-day Saints,” the most important thing in those names is the absence of the Savior’s name. To remove the Lord’s name from the Lord’s Church is a major victory for Satan. When we discard the Savior’s name, we are subtly disregarding all that Jesus Christ did for us—even His Atonement.” [1] ...

Apologetics and Evidence

Search This Blog