Skip to main content

Do Aliens Exist?


I know that this is an enormous topic which we may never reach a solid conclusion because of cultural desire alone with Star Wars, all the Marvel and D.C. comics and movies with characters in them from space, as well as Star Trek and all the others not mentioned, but it is interesting to discuss.

I think the question of space aliens arises because of the vast amount of space in our universe. Hubble reveals an estimated 100 billion galaxies (With our own Milky Way Galaxy being but only one of those), and that is just what can be seen with amplified sight from our planet. The probability just seems to be immeasurable that there is life on other planets because of the enormity of outer space.

My first exposure to the idea of aliens happened when I came home from a county fair and my sister and her high school boyfriend were watching the movie, Aliens. So, I asked them what was going on. I kid you not, from that moment on, I had an extreme fear of aliens until their big eyed, green faces became a fad in our part of the country. I remember having night terrors as a tween because of a book cover I once saw. I was terrified at the concept of them, which I believe caused me to consider them quite frequently.

That said, I suppose it would be prudent to define what a space alien is. I will define a space alien as any form of life—preferably, but not necessarily, intelligent, physical, life—anywhere in the universe other than on Planet Earth.

From a biblical perspective, the existence of life on other planets must be at the mercies of several measures:

Would aliens be created? Or would they always exist?
John 1:1-3 says, “In the beginning was the word and the Word was with God and the word was God. He was with God in the beginning. Through Him all things were made. Without Him nothing was made that has been made.”

The “Word” (λόγος) is the Living Word, which is Jesus Christ. This tells us that nothing in this entire physical universe was created without Jesus… including aliens. This passage alone shows that aliens could not have always existed, but there are several more. Colossians 1:16 for example, says, “For by him all things were created, in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominions or rulers or authorities—all things were created through him and for him.” “Heaven” can be understood as everything observed by the eyes and beyond, because this is where God resides (See Matt. 5:34, 45 and 48; Mark 13:27). If aliens always existed, they would then have to be transcendent beings, meaning that they would have to exist outside of the physical universe, because we know beyond a reasonable doubt that the universe had an ultimate, absolute beginning.[1] Nothing in the physical universe, except through miracles, could exist from outside the universe. Therefore, their appearances to humans would have to be considered miracles (a supernatural event) if aliens were never created.

There is a problem with this however, because a being that exists uncaused would be a necessary being. A necessary being does not have a cause for its existence. A necessary being is the cause for beings that are contingent. I am a contingent being, for instance. My existence is contingent ultimately on a necessary being. We cannot have infinite regress of contingent beings, because nothing physical can be actually infinite. Space and time has its limitations, according to the beginning of the universe (This is a huge subject as well, and I do not want to get off topic). The point here is that there can only be one necessary being. There must be an uncaused cause, which, that uncaused cause itself must not be caused, based on the principle of causality. There is, therefore, only one being that is necessary and uncaused. “If there were two unlimited beings, how could you tell them apart?”[2] Therefore, aliens cannot be self-caused, nor could they have always existed. So if aliens do exist, they are, according to the Bible, created through Jesus and for Jesus.

If aliens do exist, then Jesus keeps them alive.
Colossians 1:17 continues, “And he is before all things, and in him all things hold together.”
He is the sustainer of all things, just as Hebrews 1:3 reveals as well: “He is the radiance of the glory of God and the exact imprint of his nature, and he upholds the universe by the word of his power...” Think of it like Him working in order to keep His creation alive. As soon as He withdrawals His hand, life ceases to exist. Aliens would not be out of this category. They too, would die at the withdrawal of the power of Christ.

With all of this being said, it seems that there are some questions which should be raised. For instance, if there are no aliens, would it make God less powerful in any respect? We get the idea that God would be more powerful because there would be intelligence out there somewhere and it would give us reason to revere God more than we do now. But the reality is, God created all of everything we see ex nihilo (out of nothing). What could be possibly more awesome than that? If aliens do exist, they would be physical beings, which means that they would have been created, much like humans or ants.

I do not intend to be the destroyer of fantasies and dreams, but just because there is intelligent life on this planet does not mean that there is life on other planets. It would be logically fallacious to conclude that life exists out there because life exists in here.

How much more would it show us how much God loves us if we knew that God created all of this, just for us? If God created all of this, the billions of galaxies, just for us, for our eyes to see the wonder of God’s creative beauty, wouldn’t this different facet seem to reveal His deep love and desire for us?
The outstanding work of Starry Night, by the Dutch impressionist Vincent Van Gogh, seems to point to the idea that the night sky with all of its lights and curiosities is a thing of objective beauty. My friend, Tim Stratton, of Free Thinking Ministries discusses objective beauty. I also want to give an example of objective beauty, which is the night sky. I’m not talking about a person living under the smog of Los Angeles looking up and seeing the sky at night, I’m saying a clear, early summer night in say, Montana, the Big Sky country. Unblemished by pollution of smog, fire or light. Even through the lenses of the space telescopes, I would think it would be next to impossible for someone to truthfully say that it is not beautiful. A person looking up at Aurora Borealis could not in any real or serious manner say that it was ugly. Why do colorblind people receiving EnChroma glasses burst into tears or start shaking after putting them on? Ultimately, because God exists.
I am offering a reasonable explanation for the vast size of the universe which does not necessarily require aliens. In other words, maybe the universe is so big, just so our eyes can soak up the objective beauty that God created just for us. 


"The heavens declare the glory of God,and the sky above proclaims his handiwork. Day to day pours out speech, and night to night reveals knowledge. There is no speech, nor are there words, whose voice is not heard. Their voice goes out through all the earth, and their words to the end of the world."
Psalm 19:1-4

Written by Nace Howell through the grace of the Lord Jesus

© Nace Howell, 2022

[1] William Lane Craig, Reasonable Faith, 111. 2008.
[2] Norman Geisler and Ronald M. Brooks, When Skeptics Ask, 22. 2013.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Evidence and Power of Testimony: The Apostolic Witness

What to say to People who Demand more Evidence for God. Why is there something rather than nothing? Glacier National Park. © Nace Howell, 2018. The question is, how much evidence do you require? Would Jesus have to come back and slap you in the face with evidence that He is God? It seems to me that there is a line we must draw. We do this in all other areas of our lives, so why would we treat theism any different? When a court convicts, they do so “beyond a reasonable doubt.” I would like to take a few moments to explore this a bit. But before we get to that, I want to pose a question, which is… why are you the standard? What makes you think He has to prove His existence to everyone individually? He already created the universe from nothing. In the beginning, there was a big bang. Seriously… do you believe your mom when she tells you a story about her day? Did you believe the reports of 9/11 when they were happening? Do you accept the testimony of anything you hear on social ...

Baptism is Not Necessary for Salvation According to the Early Church

Let’s dive right in. The Bible says in Acts 2:37-41,    Now when they heard this they were cut to the heart, and said to Peter and the rest of the apostles, “Brothers, what shall we do?” And Peter said to them, “Repent and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins, and you will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit. For the promise is for you and for your children and for all who are far off, everyone whom the Lord our God calls to himself.” And with many other words he bore witness and continued to exhort them, saying, “Save yourselves from this crooked generation.” So those who received his word were baptized, and there were added that day about three thousand souls.   The phrase in Acts 2:38 that reads, “for the forgiveness of your sins” modifies the word repentance, not the word baptism.  See more about this Here .   What is interesting is that those who translate the above verse as meaning that baptism is a requ...

Using Guilt to Guide to the Truth

While taking a cultural apologetics class in my doctorate, I rambled along in a 30-page paper and in it, I wrote that, “I define religion as an anthropological system consisting of worship which is often filled with specific sacred rituals that seeks to appease or eradicate guilt.” My professor red-penned this and said that I am not yet in an authoritative position to make such definitions. But I was never asked how I came up with such a definition. The thing is, working on my second post-graduate degree in apologetics, studying many other religions on a deeper level was inevitable, and  by this, I noticed a pattern in all of them which was the fact that they all seek to appease or eradicate guilt, including   Buddhism , even though   many adherents of Buddhism claim that it is not a religion . The point is that all religions seek to eradicate guilt on some level, because   guilt crosses all cultures and times, to all people .   Guilt transcends all people. The ...

Self-tests of Some of the World's Religions

It is fairly common for a religion of the world to give itself a sort of test for truth, since this is one question that is asked of any religion: “Why should I believe what you are telling me is true?” After all, the answer to such a question will ultimately result in followers of specific beliefs and doctrines, let alone religions, or will result in a lack of followers.  If a religion can answer this question posed by seekers and thinkers, and therefore train its adherents to be able to answer why a religion is true, this will inevitably help people believe in such, even if the claims are false. If there is no answer, this is where a religion will perhaps find more trouble for itself.  Many religions make an appeal to a higher authority, namely,  God , for the veracity of their existence and as a result, no one can question the truth from such an authority. This is correct in a sense, that  if in fact God is making such a claim, then what is said or stated is true ...

The God of the Killdozer Operator, Marvin Heemeyer

While working toward becoming an apologist and a pastor, I was a heavy equipment operator. I have over 15 years’ experience in the field, focusing on hydrological restorations (stream bank and river restoration and water dam removals) and site development for building pads (ranging from houses to one million + sq. ft. warehouses). I say this because I want to show where the heart for writing article this came about. Marvin Heemeyer purchased a bulldozer from an auction which was a Komatsu D355A with an operating weight of 97,907 lbs. (this does not include the weight of Heemeyer’s fabricated addition). In the picture above, I am operating a Komatsu D155AX which has an operating weight of 89,300 lbs. (If I remember correctly, we were developing the site for a 550,000 sq. ft. warehouse building pad). Heemeyer then went on a rampage in his armored bulldozer in Granby, CO. I don’t want to go into great details about what led up to Heemeyer doing what he did, nor do I want to go into great ...

Two Problems Jesus has with the Mormon Doctrine of Eternal Families

Mormonism teaches that those who are married in a temple can be married for eternity. In Doctrine and Covenants 132:15–20, we find the following:   15 Therefore, if a man marry him a wife in the world, and he marry her not by me nor by my word , and he covenant with her so long as he is in the world and she with him, their covenant and marriage are not of force when they are dead , and when they are out of the world; therefore, they are not bound by any law when they are out of the world. 16 Therefore, when they are out of the world they neither marry nor are given in marriage; but are appointed angels in heaven, which angels are ministering servants, to minister for those who are worthy of a far more, and an exceeding, and an eternal weight of glory. 17 For these angels did not abide my law; therefore, they cannot be enlarged, but remain separately and singly, without exaltation, in their saved condition, to all eternity; and from henceforth are not gods, but are angels of God for...

An Overlooked Argument Against the Book of Mormon

The Book of Mormon is written in a style of language that was not used by anyone at the time that it was written and published. This style of English is called   Early Modern English . This fact is an anachronism that I find to be severely overlooked by those who seek the truth about the Book of Mormon. Many Mormons will instantly write this objection off concerning the veracity of the Book of Mormon, even to the point of saying that such an objection is lazy and pitiful, while not giving any rebuttals worth their weight.   I recently insinuated the absurdity of the Book of Mormon by asking the question, “Why was the Book of Mormon translated into Early Modern English?” I’m saying that it is absurd that the BoM uses an out-of-date language. A Mormon replied to me that the Bible has equal absurdities. He said, “Why is [The BoM translation into Early Modern English] absurd? Is it absurd that God uses a donkey to speak to Balaam in Numbers 22?”  First, this is a  tu quo...

Defending Christianity against Jehovah’s Witnesses

Defending Christianity against Jehovah’s Witnesses Using much of their “bible” to refute them “But in your hearts set apart Christ as Lord. Always be prepared to give an answer to everyone who asks you to give the reason for the hope that you have. But do this with gentleness and respect ” (NIV 1 Peter 3:15). In other words, LOVE THEM . Jehovah’s Witnesses                                       Biblical Truths Jehovah’s Witnesses do not believe in the Trinity. J.Ws. believe that Jesus was a “little god” (lower case g). J.Ws. believe in a different “ Jesus ” because of the NWT accounts. J.Ws. call themselves “Christians.” J.Ws. believe Jesus is not to be worshiped. J.Ws. believe that Jesus was once, and is again, Michael the archangel. Genesis 1:26 says, “Let Us crea...

Who Made God? Identifying Categorical Errors

A category is simply a distinct class to which something belongs… A set of objects that can be treated as equal in some way. A Macintosh apple belongs to the category, apple, and not what we categorize as an orange. Similarly, colors are in a different category than taste.   When we say, “apples and oranges” what we mean is that there has been a confusion of categories. Sure, they are both fruit, but when you examine both, there is an obvious difference. An apple is not an orange, and an orange is not an apple. Macintosh, Granny Smith, and red delicious are all apples. Navel, blood, and Valencia are all oranges. To mix the two, for instance, to call a navel orange an apple, would be a categorical error, sometimes referred to as a category mistake.      How Identifying Categorical Errors can Help with Apologetics It seems that simply learning about or being reminded of categorical errors can help us be more aware of them. We have all heard or thought of ourselves, the...

How to Show a Mormon the Difference Between the Mormon Jesus and the Biblical Jesus

I find that Mormons frequently claim that they are Christians, and that they want to be referred to as Christians, and that they have even recently sought to distance themselves from the word “Mormon.” The problem is, they worship another Jesus, and here is how to show them the difference between the Mormon Jesus and the Biblical Jesus. Before we get to that, some clarifications are necessary. Specifically, that they cannot even distance themselves from being called "Mormons."   The Mormon President Russell Nelson said,    “What’s in a name or, in this case, a nickname? When it comes to nicknames of the Church, such as the “LDS Church,” the “Mormon Church,” or the “Church of the Latter-day Saints,” the most important thing in those names is the absence of the Savior’s name. To remove the Lord’s name from the Lord’s Church is a major victory for Satan. When we discard the Savior’s name, we are subtly disregarding all that Jesus Christ did for us—even His Atonement.” [1] ...