Skip to main content

The Value of Human Life



Life is precious...

In researching for leading a discussion on the nature of the soul and the mind/body problem, I remember reading an article on flashes of light at the moment of fertilization of an egg by a sperm.

Please check out this brief video clip:

There is a correlation with zinc and light at the moment of fertilization which researchers are calling a "zinc firework," which is quite literally a flash of light. I think this is extraordinary for several reasons.


The Bible Describes God as Light

In 1 John 1:5-7, the Bible says, 
“This is the message we have heard from him and declare to you: God is light; in him there is no darkness at all. If we claim to have fellowship with him and yet walk in the darkness, we lie and do not live out the truth. But if we walk in the light, as he is in the light, we have fellowship with one another, and the blood of Jesus, his Son, purifies us from all sin.” 
It is interesting how John describes the Almighty in this passage. There is such a vivid contrast between light and darkness in this picture that the author paints. He is telling us that God is not physical, but Spirit. In any case, we also know that God is Spirit, and His worshipers must worship Him in Spirit and truth from John chapter 4.


The Bible Describes Jesus as Light


Also in John’s gospel, we find an interesting description of Jesus as well: “In Him was life, and that life was the light of all mankind. The light shines in the darkness, and the darkness has not overcome it. There was a man sent from God whose name was John. He came as a witness to testify concerning that light, so that through him all might believe. He himself was not the light; he came only as a witness to the light. The true light that gives light to everyone was coming into the world” (John 1:4-9).
This passage is saying that Jesus was light, and that this light was the light of all mankind. Look again at the last sentence in this passage; “The true light that gives light to everyone…” Jesus is the true light, and He gives light to everyone! Could this light be describing a soul? If the lack of a soul means death, which is how many theologians would define death, when a soul leaves a body, then a soul entering a body would seem to mean life, which would make a lot of sense in this passage in John.


The Shroud of Turin has an Image Burned into its Fabric


If the Shroud of Turin is for real, which many people believe that it is (and honestly they have several reasons to believe such), then there is a photographic negative which burned into the fabric, which seems that this would have been caused by something dealing with light. If this is where the Spirit re-entered the body of Jesus Christ, then this would all seem to make perfect sense. Do you see the significance of both cases of this flash of light? If there is a flash of light that happens when an egg is fertilized, why would it be out of the question that there was a flash of light when Jesus was resurrected? When He re-entered into the lifeless body? https://www.shroud.com/


Some Implications


First of all, if a soul/spirit enters a human being at the moment of conception (the reason for the flash of light is what I am arguing), then it seems that abortion is out of the question. Do you really want to be the one responsible for destroying life? NY just went completely numb in the heart (and brain) because they now allow abortion up to birth. Wouldn’t a soul in a body mean that this is equal to personhood? How do we define personhood/person? How do we know that one has personhood? It seems that this is to what it all boils down. We will keep it simple, yet not out of the question with consciousness. A person is definitely a person of they are conscious. But what does that look like? Is a person in a coma conscious? Well, if they are, then it seems we better not pull the plug too early.
How about someone with special needs? I had a cousin who had cerebral palsy all of my life. As a child, I didn’t understand what was going on with her. She was probably about 10 years older than me. She had no reasoning, and one had no way of knowing how she handled morality and immorality. She could not function at all, according to memory, and she lived in a special home all of her life, up until death. Was she conscious? Did she have a soul? Was she a person? Yes, without a doubt. This flash of light seems to be correlated with the soul entering into an entity, which is ultimate personhood. In other words, the standard of personhood is having a human soul.
In our day and age, we are letting go of the idea that life is very precious. There are countries now who will help you die if you want to, and abortion plagues the face of our planet. Shouldn’t one of the most extreme goals in life be to live? Yet we are finding so many excuses to kill people off. Those who are elderly get to decide when they die now. What happened to letting God be God? Who knows if the sickness that someone is going through will change and they will be healed!? It seems that pain is a part of being human and that the human experience cannot be fully completed if one ends their life early or if they do not even get a start at life.
I say this now while not in pain, but I do think that it is fascinating that there is a threshold of pain. The pain can only get so bad before our bodies shut off. It is not like when we are in pain that the pain escalates and we are under an amount of pain never reached before in the history of human beings. Our bodies have protective measures that will deal with things we cannot handle. Much like extreme pain. In any event, while we are conscious as human beings, from fertilization to when our soul leaves our body,
We don’t consider life as something precious today because people are told that they come from monkeys, which ultimately came from inorganic matter… that their existence ultimately came from chance. With this idea bleeding into other worldviews, we become desensitized as people who once saw life as something precious. Now, it seems that it doesn’t sting as much when we hear of an actor committing suicide. A mass shooting has enormous shock value for those not involved in any way, but what does it carry beyond that? Do we really contemplate these things enough? What about abortion? Do we really want to be responsible for murdering babies, of all people? What in the world happened to our sensibility? What happened to our value of life and seeing it as precious? The Bible says that we should go forth and multiply, I think that the reason for that is because life is precious. Think of the odds that are required for life to even exist on planet earth. Our environment on earth is so finely tuned that even the tiniest change would render all life on earth as lost.
Life is precious. Even Buddhists recognize this. They feel bad when they kill mosquitoes that are sucking their blood. I do not think that we need to feel bad about this, because God made us rulers over all animals as human beings (Genesis 1:26-27). Human life is intrinsically valuable, and we are missing it. Many today are not afraid to kill human babies, but anytime someone kills a dog, look out! I have a friend who I am not very close with whose wife was ferociously bit by a dog. Not a small bite, but it was pretty serious. Not only did the owners of the dog let it live, but it was not even punished. How does a dog know that it is doing something wrong? Do dogs have morals or are they trained to do what we tell them to do by our morals? What if a trained dog decides to be a dog one day and bite someone in the face? Why in the world would we put up with something like this? It seems that the dog should be put down, however you call it, because what if it happened again? What if it went even further in its destruction? What if it was your wife that was next? Or your small child? This article values human life over all other life on earth. The reason for this is because human life is more valuable. Even more valuable than an injury to a human by a nonhuman.   

Ouch levers.

Take a quick look at Exodus 21:28-32: “If a bull gores a man or woman to death, the bull is to be stoned to death, and its meat must not be eaten. But the owner of the bull will not be held responsible. If, however, the bull has had the habit of goring and the owner has been warned but has not kept it penned up and it kills a man or woman, the bull is to be stoned and its owner also is to be put to death. However, if payment is demanded, the owner may redeem his life by the payment of whatever is demanded. This law also applies if the bull gores a son or daughter. If the bull gores a male or female slave, the owner must pay thirty shekels of silver to the master of the slave, and the bull is to be stoned to death” (Emphasis mine).
It is clear from this reading that human life is held infinitely higher in value than animal life. The reason for this is because animal life is not intrinsically valuable. Why is the owner to be put to death if the bull has had a habit of goring? Because the owner no longer values human life as he should and this behavior does not work in society! Imagine if everyone who had bulls with a habit of goring people to death. Bulls or any living thing under the rule of man is not the priority.
Sure, we can dumb it down to a case by case basis, but an animal that bites a human should seriously be considered dangerous against humans, no matter what the event.  The problem in all of this is that people have dramatically reduced their value of human life. It is time that we take this value up again and see human life as extremely precious. 

“A new command I give you: Love one another. As I have loved you, so you must love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you love one another” –John 13:34-35


Written by Nace Howell through the grace of the Lord Jesus
© Nace Howell, 2019

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Evidence and Power of Testimony: The Apostolic Witness

What to say to People who Demand more Evidence for God. Why is there something rather than nothing? Glacier National Park. © Nace Howell, 2018. The question is, how much evidence do you require? Would Jesus have to come back and slap you in the face with evidence that He is God? It seems to me that there is a line we must draw. We do this in all other areas of our lives, so why would we treat theism any different? When a court convicts, they do so “beyond a reasonable doubt.” I would like to take a few moments to explore this a bit. But before we get to that, I want to pose a question, which is… why are you the standard? What makes you think He has to prove His existence to everyone individually? He already created the universe from nothing. In the beginning, there was a big bang. Seriously… do you believe your mom when she tells you a story about her day? Did you believe the reports of 9/11 when they were happening? Do you accept the testimony of anything you hear on social ...

Baptism is Not Necessary for Salvation According to the Early Church

Let’s dive right in. The Bible says in Acts 2:37-41,    Now when they heard this they were cut to the heart, and said to Peter and the rest of the apostles, “Brothers, what shall we do?” And Peter said to them, “Repent and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins, and you will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit. For the promise is for you and for your children and for all who are far off, everyone whom the Lord our God calls to himself.” And with many other words he bore witness and continued to exhort them, saying, “Save yourselves from this crooked generation.” So those who received his word were baptized, and there were added that day about three thousand souls.   The phrase in Acts 2:38 that reads, “for the forgiveness of your sins” modifies the word repentance, not the word baptism.  See more about this Here .   What is interesting is that those who translate the above verse as meaning that baptism is a requ...

Self-tests of Some of the World's Religions

It is fairly common for a religion of the world to give itself a sort of test for truth, since this is one question that is asked of any religion: “Why should I believe what you are telling me is true?” After all, the answer to such a question will ultimately result in followers of specific beliefs and doctrines, let alone religions, or will result in a lack of followers.  If a religion can answer this question posed by seekers and thinkers, and therefore train its adherents to be able to answer why a religion is true, this will inevitably help people believe in such, even if the claims are false. If there is no answer, this is where a religion will perhaps find more trouble for itself.  Many religions make an appeal to a higher authority, namely,  God , for the veracity of their existence and as a result, no one can question the truth from such an authority. This is correct in a sense, that  if in fact God is making such a claim, then what is said or stated is true ...

Using Guilt to Guide to the Truth

While taking a cultural apologetics class in my doctorate, I rambled along in a 30-page paper and in it, I wrote that, “I define religion as an anthropological system consisting of worship which is often filled with specific sacred rituals that seeks to appease or eradicate guilt.” My professor red-penned this and said that I am not yet in an authoritative position to make such definitions. But I was never asked how I came up with such a definition. The thing is, working on my second post-graduate degree in apologetics, studying many other religions on a deeper level was inevitable, and  by this, I noticed a pattern in all of them which was the fact that they all seek to appease or eradicate guilt, including   Buddhism , even though   many adherents of Buddhism claim that it is not a religion . The point is that all religions seek to eradicate guilt on some level, because   guilt crosses all cultures and times, to all people .   Guilt transcends all people. The ...

Two Problems Jesus has with the Mormon Doctrine of Eternal Families

Mormonism teaches that those who are married in a temple can be married for eternity. In Doctrine and Covenants 132:15–20, we find the following:   15 Therefore, if a man marry him a wife in the world, and he marry her not by me nor by my word , and he covenant with her so long as he is in the world and she with him, their covenant and marriage are not of force when they are dead , and when they are out of the world; therefore, they are not bound by any law when they are out of the world. 16 Therefore, when they are out of the world they neither marry nor are given in marriage; but are appointed angels in heaven, which angels are ministering servants, to minister for those who are worthy of a far more, and an exceeding, and an eternal weight of glory. 17 For these angels did not abide my law; therefore, they cannot be enlarged, but remain separately and singly, without exaltation, in their saved condition, to all eternity; and from henceforth are not gods, but are angels of God for...

The God of the Killdozer Operator, Marvin Heemeyer

While working toward becoming an apologist and a pastor, I was a heavy equipment operator. I have over 15 years’ experience in the field, focusing on hydrological restorations (stream bank and river restoration and water dam removals) and site development for building pads (ranging from houses to one million + sq. ft. warehouses). I say this because I want to show where the heart for writing article this came about. Marvin Heemeyer purchased a bulldozer from an auction which was a Komatsu D355A with an operating weight of 97,907 lbs. (this does not include the weight of Heemeyer’s fabricated addition). In the picture above, I am operating a Komatsu D155AX which has an operating weight of 89,300 lbs. (If I remember correctly, we were developing the site for a 550,000 sq. ft. warehouse building pad). Heemeyer then went on a rampage in his armored bulldozer in Granby, CO. I don’t want to go into great details about what led up to Heemeyer doing what he did, nor do I want to go into great ...

An Overlooked Argument Against the Book of Mormon

The Book of Mormon is written in a style of language that was not used by anyone at the time that it was written and published. This style of English is called   Early Modern English . This fact is an anachronism that I find to be severely overlooked by those who seek the truth about the Book of Mormon. Many Mormons will instantly write this objection off concerning the veracity of the Book of Mormon, even to the point of saying that such an objection is lazy and pitiful, while not giving any rebuttals worth their weight.   I recently insinuated the absurdity of the Book of Mormon by asking the question, “Why was the Book of Mormon translated into Early Modern English?” I’m saying that it is absurd that the BoM uses an out-of-date language. A Mormon replied to me that the Bible has equal absurdities. He said, “Why is [The BoM translation into Early Modern English] absurd? Is it absurd that God uses a donkey to speak to Balaam in Numbers 22?”  First, this is a  tu quo...

Who Made God? Identifying Categorical Errors

A category is simply a distinct class to which something belongs… A set of objects that can be treated as equal in some way. A Macintosh apple belongs to the category, apple, and not what we categorize as an orange. Similarly, colors are in a different category than taste.   When we say, “apples and oranges” what we mean is that there has been a confusion of categories. Sure, they are both fruit, but when you examine both, there is an obvious difference. An apple is not an orange, and an orange is not an apple. Macintosh, Granny Smith, and red delicious are all apples. Navel, blood, and Valencia are all oranges. To mix the two, for instance, to call a navel orange an apple, would be a categorical error, sometimes referred to as a category mistake.      How Identifying Categorical Errors can Help with Apologetics It seems that simply learning about or being reminded of categorical errors can help us be more aware of them. We have all heard or thought of ourselves, the...

Objectivity is the Language of Heaven

NDErs (i. e. people who have claimed to have had a   Near Death Experience ) often report that when they go to Heaven, they frequently see and recognize people such as friends and family members. It is often also reported that when they were communicating with friends and relatives, they realized that they weren’t speaking English, but that they were telepathically speaking to one another.   It seems it would be impossible to have communication with others without learning every language that has ever existed under the sun, but since heaven is a perfect place, [1]  then communication should be perfect as well. In other words, it seems unlikely that there are barriers to communication. So, I should be able to communicate with the Apostles, upon my arrival for instance, but how? I personally only really know how to speak English fluently. My Spanish, Japanese, German, Russian, Chinese, and Latin is like that of a child, and my Greek is only in reading and writing.  If ...

How to Show a Mormon the Difference Between the Mormon Jesus and the Biblical Jesus

I find that Mormons frequently claim that they are Christians, and that they want to be referred to as Christians, and that they have even recently sought to distance themselves from the word “Mormon.” The problem is, they worship another Jesus, and here is how to show them the difference between the Mormon Jesus and the Biblical Jesus. Before we get to that, some clarifications are necessary. Specifically, that they cannot even distance themselves from being called "Mormons."   The Mormon President Russell Nelson said,    “What’s in a name or, in this case, a nickname? When it comes to nicknames of the Church, such as the “LDS Church,” the “Mormon Church,” or the “Church of the Latter-day Saints,” the most important thing in those names is the absence of the Savior’s name. To remove the Lord’s name from the Lord’s Church is a major victory for Satan. When we discard the Savior’s name, we are subtly disregarding all that Jesus Christ did for us—even His Atonement.” [1] ...