The Name Change of the Latter-Day Saints

Something needs to be understood about the name change of the Mormons. It should not be forgotten. The real reason the name is changing is purely because of deception. Think about it… If they are called “Mormons” doesn’t that separate them from evangelicalism?

It is good for people to have the mindset that “The Church of Jesus Christ of the Latter-Day Saints” is equal to the Mormonism that they always knew as a cult. It seems that the whole reason for the name change is because of an esoteric agenda. This is not a conspiracy... hear me out.

Below are some links that point to the decision for the name change. The first is the general conference for the LDS church, the second is showing that the Mormon tabernacle Choir will now be called, the Tabernacle Choir at Temple Square. These names are less abrasive when it comes to Mormonism. Through the years, Mormons have documented everything, which helps them in their destruction. A few years ago, they wanted to be more open about the history of their beloved prophet, but when that happened, many people left the Mormon faith because of such. They are in the end, creating a bad name for themselves, and are not proud of their history, so they are once again, rewriting history.

Snippet of LDS Pres. at General conference from link below.

https://www.lds.org/general-conference/2018/10/the-correct-name-of-the-church?lang=eng

https://www.billboard.com/articles/news/8478554/mormon-tabernacle-choir-changes-name-as-church-shifts-away-from-mormon-lds-label

In his address to the Mormons at the 2018 Mormon general conference, President Russell Nelson said, “Unfortunately, many who hear the term Mormon may think that we worship Mormon.”

The problem is that Mormons do not worship the biblical Jesus Christ either. This is why there is such a desire to change names. Mormonism teaches that Jesus is the brother of Satan. For one thing, how then is Jesus the only begotten Son of God? Doesn’t this change who Jesus is? Also, in the Book of Mormon, in 2 Nephi 25:23, we find that it says, “It is by grace that you are saved after all you can do.” This is a serious plagiarism, as well as a direct opposition to what is found in the Bible.

Ephesians 2:8-9 says, “For it is by grace you have been saved, through faith—and this is not from yourselves, it is the gift of God— 9 not by works, so that no one can boast.”

Not only does Joseph Smith plagiarize the Bible from this verse, but he changes it to suit his own desires (see 2 Timothy 4:3). This is in direct opposition to what the Bible teaches. “After all you can do” means that Jesus picks up where you cannot fulfill. It means that he cleans up your mess. Lynn Wilder, the author of Unveiling Grace, refers to the Mormon Jesus as “the Janitor” He comes by and cleans up what you are not able to earn. In other words, in Mormonism, a person can earn part of their salvation by what they do… By how good they are…

The New Testament opposes this sternly. “No one can boast” in Ephesians 2:9 gives the reason why it wouldn’t even make sense logically speaking, that someone could earn their salvation: so you cannot brag about how awesome you are. Romans 3:10-18 tells us what kind of state that humans are really in, through the eyes of God:

There is no one righteous, not even one;

there is no one who understands;

there is no one who seeks God.

All have turned away,

they have together become worthless;

there is no one who does good,

not even one.”

“Their throats are open graves;

their tongues practice deceit.”

“The poison of vipers is on their lips.”

“Their mouths are full of cursing and bitterness.”

“Their feet are swift to shed blood;

ruin and misery mark their ways,

and the way of peace they do not know.”

“There is no fear of God before their eyes.”

The book of Isaiah teaches us that “All of us have become like one who is unclean, and all our righteous acts are like filthy rags; we all shrivel up like a leaf, and like the wind our sins sweep us away.” As much as we hate to admit it, our righteousness is about as nice and as clean as a used menstrual cloth. This is the picture that God paints through the words of Isaiah in chapter 64, verse 6.

The Mormon Jesus and the biblical Jesus are two different Jesus’s. Think of it like this, how many guys do you know with the name “Michael” (or Mike)? Are they the same? Definitely not. They are all men, for sure, but they are different men. Think of the Mormon Jesus in the same way. He is very different from the biblical Jesus. The Biblical Jesus is the Son of God… the only Son of God. John describes Him as the Lamb of God who “takes away the sin of the world” (John 1:29). One major rule in apologetics is to understand definitions. They could be saying the same words that you are using, but they might be totally different in meaning. Make sure that definitions of important words are clearly understood in conversation.

The Mormon response to Jesus after death would be, “Thanks for your help, Jesus…” The Bible does not leave room for something like this. The old hymn is correct when it says,

“Jesus paid it all,

all to Him I owe.

Sin has left a crimson stain

He washed it white as snow.”

Friends, Jesus paid it all. We cannot earn any part of our salvation. There is absolutely a condition, which is that we “Confess with our mouth that Jesus is Lord and believe in our hearts that God raised Him from the dead, then we will be saved” (Romans 10:9). Yet this condition is not any type of work. John 6:28-29 says, “Then they asked him, “What must we do to do the works God requires?”

Jesus answered, “The work of God is this: to believe in the one he has sent.”

We are not breaking a sweat by believing anything. We cannot earn anything by believing anything. We must trust in Christ alone to rescue us from drowning in an ocean of sin. We cannot pull ourselves out of this ocean of sin by our own boot straps.

John 14:6 tells us that Jesus is the way, the truth, and the life; no one comes to the Father but through Him alone. There is nothing else… there is no one else... We cannot help Jesus fulfill or complete our salvation. Yet this is what Mormonism teaches. It is a dangerous game, folks. Be careful what you get into.

“For the time will come when people will not put up with sound doctrine. Instead, to suit their own desires, they will gather around them a great number of teachers to say what their itching ears want to hear. They will turn their ears away from the truth and turn aside to myths. But you, keep your head in all situations, endure hardship, do the work of an evangelist, discharge all the duties of your ministry. –2 Timothy 4:3-5

For more, see my book on Mormonism:

https://www.amazon.com/Mormonism-Refuting-Fundamental-Apologetics-Latter-Day/dp/1662885377/

Written by Nace Howell through the grace of the Lord Jesus

Comments

The Evidence and Power of Testimony: The Apostolic Witness

What to say to People who Demand more Evidence for God. Why is there something rather than nothing? Glacier National Park. © Nace Howell, 2018. The question is, how much evidence do you require? Would Jesus have to come back and slap you in the face with evidence that He is God? It seems to me that there is a line we must draw. We do this in all other areas of our lives, so why would we treat theism any different? When a court convicts, they do so “beyond a reasonable doubt.” I would like to take a few moments to explore this a bit. But before we get to that, I want to pose a question, which is… why are you the standard? What makes you think He has to prove His existence to everyone individually? He already created the universe from nothing. In the beginning, there was a big bang. Seriously… do you believe your mom when she tells you a story about her day? Did you believe the reports of 9/11 when they were happening? Do you accept the testimony of anything you hear on social ...

Baptism is Not Necessary for Salvation According to the Early Church

Let’s dive right in. The Bible says in Acts 2:37-41, Now when they heard this they were cut to the heart, and said to Peter and the rest of the apostles, “Brothers, what shall we do?” And Peter said to them, “Repent and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins, and you will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit. For the promise is for you and for your children and for all who are far off, everyone whom the Lord our God calls to himself.” And with many other words he bore witness and continued to exhort them, saying, “Save yourselves from this crooked generation.” So those who received his word were baptized, and there were added that day about three thousand souls. The phrase in Acts 2:38 that reads, “for the forgiveness of your sins” modifies the word repentance, not the word baptism. See more about this Here . What is interesting is that those who translate the above verse as meaning that baptism is a requ...

Using Guilt to Guide to the Truth

While taking a cultural apologetics class in my doctorate, I rambled along in a 30-page paper and in it, I wrote that, “I define religion as an anthropological system consisting of worship which is often filled with specific sacred rituals that seeks to appease or eradicate guilt.” My professor red-penned this and said that I am not yet in an authoritative position to make such definitions. But I was never asked how I came up with such a definition. The thing is, working on my second post-graduate degree in apologetics, studying many other religions on a deeper level was inevitable, and by this, I noticed a pattern in all of them which was the fact that they all seek to appease or eradicate guilt, including Buddhism , even though many adherents of Buddhism claim that it is not a religion . The point is that all religions seek to eradicate guilt on some level, because guilt crosses all cultures and times, to all people . Guilt transcends all people. The ...

Self-tests of Some of the World's Religions

It is fairly common for a religion of the world to give itself a sort of test for truth, since this is one question that is asked of any religion: “Why should I believe what you are telling me is true?” After all, the answer to such a question will ultimately result in followers of specific beliefs and doctrines, let alone religions, or will result in a lack of followers. If a religion can answer this question posed by seekers and thinkers, and therefore train its adherents to be able to answer why a religion is true, this will inevitably help people believe in such, even if the claims are false. If there is no answer, this is where a religion will perhaps find more trouble for itself. Many religions make an appeal to a higher authority, namely, God , for the veracity of their existence and as a result, no one can question the truth from such an authority. This is correct in a sense, that if in fact God is making such a claim, then what is said or stated is true ...

The God of the Killdozer Operator, Marvin Heemeyer

While working toward becoming an apologist and a pastor, I was a heavy equipment operator. I have over 15 years’ experience in the field, focusing on hydrological restorations (stream bank and river restoration and water dam removals) and site development for building pads (ranging from houses to one million + sq. ft. warehouses). I say this because I want to show where the heart for writing article this came about. Marvin Heemeyer purchased a bulldozer from an auction which was a Komatsu D355A with an operating weight of 97,907 lbs. (this does not include the weight of Heemeyer’s fabricated addition). In the picture above, I am operating a Komatsu D155AX which has an operating weight of 89,300 lbs. (If I remember correctly, we were developing the site for a 550,000 sq. ft. warehouse building pad). Heemeyer then went on a rampage in his armored bulldozer in Granby, CO. I don’t want to go into great details about what led up to Heemeyer doing what he did, nor do I want to go into great ...

Two Problems Jesus has with the Mormon Doctrine of Eternal Families

Mormonism teaches that those who are married in a temple can be married for eternity. In Doctrine and Covenants 132:15–20, we find the following: 15 Therefore, if a man marry him a wife in the world, and he marry her not by me nor by my word , and he covenant with her so long as he is in the world and she with him, their covenant and marriage are not of force when they are dead , and when they are out of the world; therefore, they are not bound by any law when they are out of the world. 16 Therefore, when they are out of the world they neither marry nor are given in marriage; but are appointed angels in heaven, which angels are ministering servants, to minister for those who are worthy of a far more, and an exceeding, and an eternal weight of glory. 17 For these angels did not abide my law; therefore, they cannot be enlarged, but remain separately and singly, without exaltation, in their saved condition, to all eternity; and from henceforth are not gods, but are angels of God for...

An Overlooked Argument Against the Book of Mormon

The Book of Mormon is written in a style of language that was not used by anyone at the time that it was written and published. This style of English is called Early Modern English . This fact is an anachronism that I find to be severely overlooked by those who seek the truth about the Book of Mormon. Many Mormons will instantly write this objection off concerning the veracity of the Book of Mormon, even to the point of saying that such an objection is lazy and pitiful, while not giving any rebuttals worth their weight. I recently insinuated the absurdity of the Book of Mormon by asking the question, “Why was the Book of Mormon translated into Early Modern English?” I’m saying that it is absurd that the BoM uses an out-of-date language. A Mormon replied to me that the Bible has equal absurdities. He said, “Why is [The BoM translation into Early Modern English] absurd? Is it absurd that God uses a donkey to speak to Balaam in Numbers 22?” First, this is a tu quo...

Defending Christianity against Jehovah’s Witnesses

Defending Christianity against Jehovah’s Witnesses Using much of their “bible” to refute them “But in your hearts set apart Christ as Lord. Always be prepared to give an answer to everyone who asks you to give the reason for the hope that you have. But do this with gentleness and respect ” (NIV 1 Peter 3:15). In other words, LOVE THEM . Jehovah’s Witnesses Biblical Truths Jehovah’s Witnesses do not believe in the Trinity. J.Ws. believe that Jesus was a “little god” (lower case g). J.Ws. believe in a different “ Jesus ” because of the NWT accounts. J.Ws. call themselves “Christians.” J.Ws. believe Jesus is not to be worshiped. J.Ws. believe that Jesus was once, and is again, Michael the archangel. Genesis 1:26 says, “Let Us crea...

Who Made God? Identifying Categorical Errors

A category is simply a distinct class to which something belongs… A set of objects that can be treated as equal in some way. A Macintosh apple belongs to the category, apple, and not what we categorize as an orange. Similarly, colors are in a different category than taste. When we say, “apples and oranges” what we mean is that there has been a confusion of categories. Sure, they are both fruit, but when you examine both, there is an obvious difference. An apple is not an orange, and an orange is not an apple. Macintosh, Granny Smith, and red delicious are all apples. Navel, blood, and Valencia are all oranges. To mix the two, for instance, to call a navel orange an apple, would be a categorical error, sometimes referred to as a category mistake. How Identifying Categorical Errors can Help with Apologetics It seems that simply learning about or being reminded of categorical errors can help us be more aware of them. We have all heard or thought of ourselves, the...

How to Show a Mormon the Difference Between the Mormon Jesus and the Biblical Jesus

I find that Mormons frequently claim that they are Christians, and that they want to be referred to as Christians, and that they have even recently sought to distance themselves from the word “Mormon.” The problem is, they worship another Jesus, and here is how to show them the difference between the Mormon Jesus and the Biblical Jesus. Before we get to that, some clarifications are necessary. Specifically, that they cannot even distance themselves from being called "Mormons." The Mormon President Russell Nelson said, “What’s in a name or, in this case, a nickname? When it comes to nicknames of the Church, such as the “LDS Church,” the “Mormon Church,” or the “Church of the Latter-day Saints,” the most important thing in those names is the absence of the Savior’s name. To remove the Lord’s name from the Lord’s Church is a major victory for Satan. When we discard the Savior’s name, we are subtly disregarding all that Jesus Christ did for us—even His Atonement.” [1] ...

Apologetics and Evidence

Search This Blog