Skip to main content

To Tell the Truth

Is it Wrong to tell people About Jesus? I have recently discovered a Barna report which explains that some people find it to be morally wrong to evangelize.

First of all, let me say why I think this is the case.

Under the guise of postmodernism, people believe that truth is in the subject, rather than the object. Truth is relative, in other words. If your truth is different than my truth, then it would be a severe problem, nay, a moral trespass, to offer someone a different truth that would cause them to leave their own truth. It would be offensive, and morally wrong, if it were the case that truth is relative.
For instance, if it were true for me that Mormonism was the way I saw reality, then to change my reality to biblical Christianity would be disastrous.

It seems that harming one’s reality should be a reason for concern, but the problem is, what if the way someone views the world does not correspond to the truth?

If the truth is not in us (the subject) but is outside of us (the object), then truth is not what we make it. Truth just is what it is. The Scientific Method for instance, is a philosophical tool used to discover what is true of our physical world. With this in mind, then, the Scientific Method is used to discover the truth. This is the case for all truth. It is discovered, not made. We cannot make truth any more than we can make dirt. We can pile vegetable scraps in a bucket for months at a time, but we are not making dirt. We have made a discovery that doing this will result in dirt. There is a big difference.

We cannot make our own gender either. We are born a certain way, whether male or female (or hermaphrodite, which is a birth-defect), and we cannot change what we are. If we transition from one gender to the next, we have to take all kinds of medicine in order to maintain the unnatural direction that we desire to in gender-transition. The truth is, we are what we are born as. We do not decide the truth on our gender, but we discover it (at the moment of birth, if not before).

So the poison of postmodernism is that it tells people that they can believe what they want, not what is necessarily true. This is why I believe that there are people who believe it is wrong to evangelize or proselytize. In a nutshell, because people think that truth is relative and that one person leaving what they see as truth coming to another truth is wrong.

But there are several things wrong with this.

For instance, if I leave one truth for another, then when I arrive at the new truth, under the guise of postmodernism, wouldn’t I still be in the truth? If I am leaving one truth for another truth, if truth is subjective, then I am still in the truth. So then there is no harm done. I’ve simply switched my perspective. And shouldn’t it be celebrated? Since I have discovered a truth that is better than my old truth?

The other thing wrong with this is that truth is not subjective. If Joe lives in Texas and steps outside on a 120 degree day, and he says that it is hot out, then it is true for everyone, wherever they are in the world, that when Joe stepped outside onto his porch in Texas and said that it was hot out, that he felt hot. Even if Marv lived in Northern Alaska, and it was nighttime at the time Joe said that in Texas, it would still be true that it was hot in Texas. It is obviously not hot in Alaska at that time, which is also true for the Texan, but for the Alaskan, it is true that Joe felt hot, when Joe stepped outside onto the porch, even though the Alaskan is very cold and sipping hot tea.

The Time Stamp

This points to absolute truth. Some of the readers might remember a camera that you could buy in the 80’s and 90’s which would place a time and date stamp on the picture when the roll was developed. Many cameras even offer this feature today. If I took a picture of Joe, stepping out on his porch in Texas and the photograph had a time stamp, then I took the picture to Alaska, and showed it to Marv, 2 days later and Marv said, “No, it was cold on this date and time… I remember.” Which one would be right? The problem is, Marv is using this place and time for his own place and time, which would be wrong, because it would be incorrect. So for both Marv and Joe, no matter where they are in the world, if they have the photograph, they can look at it and both agree that Joe felt hot on such a day and time on his porch in Texas. It will be true for all eternity forward. This is absolute truth, which describes all truth.

Since all truth is absolute and is discovered, and because most religions, which are worldviews, argue that they are the one true (exclusive) truth, but because they disagree (contradict) with one another, then there can only be two options: Either only one is true or none of them are true. So then, if I am a Latter-day Saint, and Mormonism turns out to be wrong, because it opposes the other religions, then for someone who does know the truth to hold it back, especially if it concerns my future well-being, then it would be wrong for them to not tell me about the truth. In other words, it would be wrong for everyone to not tell the truth if they know the only Way.

Think of cancer. Everyone hates it. Our family members have died from it, some readers might be suffering through it, and nothing about it seems to be good. Therefore if someone knew the cure for cancer, it would be morally wrong for them to not tell us about it. The reason we know this is because if we are the one with cancer, we immediately want to be healed from it! It would be morally wrong to withhold such a cure. Why? Because no one wants to experience the physical pain and heartache that one goes through with cancer.

Therefore, if we as Christians know the truth about life, through Jesus, that He died for our moral failures (sin), that He paid the price for us so that we will not fall under God’s wrath, but also that we might have eternal life, then to hold this back would be more immoral than holding back a cure for cancer, because we know that we live forever.

There are only two places that we can enter into after death. Heaven or hell. Only one of these destinations can be earned.

The truth is, it seems to be wrong to hold back the knowledge of salvation if we knew it, and if it were true. This said, it is not that we have to earn anything in sharing the Good News of Jesus with people, but our knowledge of the Truth should compel us to want to do so. 

Jesus is God, and He told us about what happens when we die. The reason we know that He is God is because we can look at His claims and read about what He did. He is unlike anyone else that walked the earth. Read His claims for yourself. Read the eye-witness accounts for yourself. How would you react if you saw the things that the apostles did?


Written by Nace Howell through the grace of the Lord Jesus 
© Nace Howell, 2020

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How to Show a Mormon the Difference Between the Mormon Jesus and the Biblical Jesus

I find that Mormons frequently claim that they are Christians, and that they want to be referred to as Christians, and that they have even recently sought to distance themselves from the word “Mormon.” The problem is, they worship another Jesus, and here is how to show them the difference between the Mormon Jesus and the Biblical Jesus. Before we get to that, some clarifications are necessary. Specifically, that they cannot even distance themselves from being called "Mormons."   The Mormon President Russell Nelson said,    “What’s in a name or, in this case, a nickname? When it comes to nicknames of the Church, such as the “LDS Church,” the “Mormon Church,” or the “Church of the Latter-day Saints,” the most important thing in those names is the absence of the Savior’s name. To remove the Lord’s name from the Lord’s Church is a major victory for Satan. When we discard the Savior’s name, we are subtly disregarding all that Jesus Christ did for us—even His Atonement.” [1]   So,

The Dividing Line of Doctrine

How and Where to Make Divisions... Sometimes, I get asked “Why do you get so up at arms about other religions?” or, “Why do you pick on other religions so much?” I think the following will help you see where I’m coming from, before I spill the beans on such.   We have difficulty sometimes in discovering where to make divisions when considering where to spend our money, and who to support, where to make purchases, and where not to do such. We also often have difficulty on how to know if a church or a congregation is a place where someone can actually become saved. Like, how can we know that a Mormon is likely not saved but we can know that a regular church attender at a gospel sound church is likely saved? What is it that would make my church attendance at a specific body no longer appropriate? Both answers to these questions deal with doctrine. If a company is pushing false doctrine using their influence and power to push a heretical doctrine or teaching, this is often when the red fla

Joseph Smith had the same Demon that influenced Muhammad

What does Islam have in common with Mormonism? Seriously, the similarities are uncanny. Like human beings, demons are creatures of habit . The Bible does not tell us much about them, but from what it does tell us, we can learn a lot. Jesus reveals to us some things about their behavior: When the unclean spirit has gone out of a person, it passes through waterless places seeking rest, but finds none. Then it says, ‘I will return to my house from which I came.’ And when it comes, it finds the house empty, swept, and put in order. Then it goes and brings with it seven other spirits more evil than itself, and they enter and dwell there, and the last state of that person is worse than the first… [1]   Jesus clearly knows that demons have typical behaviors. He has seen it many times before. He lets us know that a typical behavior for a demon is that home is where the heart is . When your house crumbles to the ground, you move to a new one. Likewise, when a person dies, the demon is f

The Highest Virtue

A virtue is a trait of excellence. What is the highest virtue? It seems that based on the nature of truth, that truth itself is perhaps the highest virtue. For instance, I could say that love is the highest virtue, but then I could ask the question of whether that is true or not. If it is or isn’t true, this places truth virtuously higher than love, at least in some sense. The fact that I can question love through the lens of truth seems to place truth above love in height of virtue. On the other hand, if I said that truth is the highest virtue, then it seems that it would be loving to tell others the truth! Perhaps truth and love go hand in hand, but this also concerns the nature of what truth is.  Truth is a requirement for love, which I argue here , but is love a requirement for truth? Love must contain truth in order to be  true  love. But truth does not have to contain love in order to be true truth. Take for instance, mathematics, or numbers in general… Sometimes, the truth hurts

The Two Systems: A Confused Definition of Love

A couple years ago I wrote an article called  the Jehovah’s Witness training videos . The article was meant to be humorous in a sense, because there are likely not any actual training videos, but it seems that they have all watched them. We can suspect this because they all often have the same points of conversation. When you talk about the Trinity, they will use the Bible like a machine gun and shoot you with verses. The verses are always the same: Colossians 1:15, Mark 10:18… So, there is an implication that they all have the same information. There is one source from where they gather their patterns and behaviors. Similarly, I think we can see the power behind the system of the world as well. We can see what this power is like by the tracks he leaves behind. The contrast of the two systems is really seen in Revelation 14:8. “Fallen, fallen is Babylon the great, she who made all nations drink the wine of the passion of her sexual immorality.” John is using the word  Babylon  here for

Objectivity is the Language of Heaven

NDErs (i. e. people who have claimed to have had a   Near Death Experience ) often report that when they go to Heaven, they frequently see and recognize people such as friends and family members. It is often also reported that when they were communicating with friends and relatives, they realized that they weren’t speaking English, but that they were telepathically speaking to one another.   It seems it would be impossible to have communication with others without learning every language that has ever existed under the sun, but since heaven is a perfect place, [1]  then communication should be perfect as well. In other words, it seems unlikely that there are barriers to communication. So, I should be able to communicate with the Apostles, upon my arrival for instance, but how? I personally only really know how to speak English fluently. My Spanish, Japanese, German, Russian, Chinese, and Latin is like that of a child, and my Greek is only in reading and writing.  If communication is me

Defending Christianity against Mormonism

“But in your hearts set apart Christ as Lord. Always be prepared to give an answer to everyone who asks you to give the reason for the hope that you have. But do this with gentleness and respect ” (NIV 1 Peter 3:15). In other words, LOVE THEM . Mormons                                                             Biblical Truths Mormons are monolaters, meaning, they believe in many gods, yet worship only one. LDS believe that “As man is, God once was; and as God is, man may become.” LDS do not believe in Hell. LDS believe God is flesh and bones. LDS believe in baptism for the dead. LDS believe Jesus and Satan are created brothers. LDS do not believe in the Trinity. LDS believe that “it is by grace we are saved, after all we can do” (Nephi 25:23). Deuteronomy 6:4 says, “Hear, O Israel: The Lord our God, the Lord is one” (See also Isaiah 43:11; Acts 5:4; 1 Timothy 2:5; Exodus 20:3; et. al.). God kn

The Evidence and Power of Testimony

What to say to People who Demand more Evidence for God. Why is there something rather than nothing? Glacier National Park. © Nace Howell, 2018. The question is, how much evidence do you require? Would Jesus have to come back and slap you in the face with evidence that He is God? It seems to me that there is a line we must draw. We do this in all other areas of our lives, so why would we treat theism any different? When a court convicts, they do so “beyond a reasonable doubt.” I would like to take a few moments to explore this a bit. But before we get to that, I want to pose a question, which is… why are you the standard? What makes you think He has to prove His existence to everyone individually? He already created the universe from nothing. In the beginning, there was a big bang. Seriously… do you believe your mom when she tells you a story about her day? Did you believe the reports of 9/11 when they were happening? Do you accept the testimony of anything you hear on social

Self-tests of Some of the World's Religions

It is fairly common for a religion of the world to give itself a sort of test for truth, since this is one question that is asked of any religion: “Why should I believe what you are telling me is true?” After all, the answer to such a question will ultimately result in followers of specific beliefs and doctrines, let alone religions, or will result in a lack of followers.  If a religion can answer this question posed by seekers and thinkers, and therefore train its adherents to be able to answer why a religion is true, this will inevitably help people believe in such, even if the claims are false. If there is no answer, this is where a religion will perhaps find more trouble for itself.  Many religions make an appeal to a higher authority, namely,  God , for the veracity of their existence and as a result, no one can question the truth from such an authority. This is correct in a sense, that  if in fact God is making such a claim, then what is said or stated is true , but the question

Argument from Beauty: Evangelical Christians have Neglected a Favorable Catalyst for the Gospel

It seems to me that some Evangelical Christians have taken a certain biblical passage in the wrong direction. Perhaps I, considering myself to be an Evangelical Christian, am guilty of such as well. Romans 12:1-2 says, “I appeal to you therefore, brothers, by the mercies of God, to present your bodies as a living sacrifice, holy and acceptable to God, which is your spiritual worship. Do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewal of your mind, that by testing you may discern what is the will of God, what is good and acceptable and perfect.”  Verse 2 is where we get the phrase,  be in the world, but don’t be of the world . What this means is that we should know our place. Our place is in heaven. The Bible says that we are citizens of heaven, and that we should think and act as if we are. Philippians 3:20-21 says, “But our citizenship is in heaven, and from it we await a Savior, the Lord Jesus Christ, who will transform our lowly body to be like his glorious body, b