Skip to main content

Contrary to Popular Opinion: Buddhism is a Religion

I have been to several predominant Buddhist countries, I live in a place with Buddhism being a predominant worldview (with a large Dharma center being less than a 40 minute drive from my home), and so this compels me to help people to see Buddhism for what it is. Many people like to say that Buddhism is not a religion, because of the negative connotations that the word “religion” has with it today for several ridiculous and poor reasons, but also because many emphasize the philosophical nature of Buddhism so much that it blinds some from seeing it for what it really is, and not seeing how it falls short of offering hope to the world.

    Consider with me, if you will, the Four Noble Truths of Buddhism. The first is the idea that suffering exists. The second is that we suffer because we are attached to people, places, animals, and things (basically, nouns). The third noble truth is that if we release the attachment to people, places, animals, and things, then we will be free from suffering. This makes sense because if we are unattached to everything, then nothing will affect us mentally or emotionally.

Before we get to the fourth noble truth, it seems that up to this point when someone makes the argument that Buddhism a philosophy and not a religion, they are correct. Up to this point, we cannot treat Buddhism like a religion. The first three noble truths seem to be completely sound, logically, and not only that but almost helpful. For instance, it is likely good advice that if I had no attachments, I would never be bothered by my friends and family dying, or if I was attached to my car and someone crashed into it, or if my beloved pet died, it would not really affect me emotionally or mentally. The problem that I see with this, is that maybe we are supposed to be attached to some things. For instance, shouldn’t we be attached to our children? It seems like a depressing world to grow up thinking that our parents are trying to eternally detach themselves from us. Not only depressing, but lonely. Similarly with husbands and wives. If we are constantly trying to detach ourselves from our spouses, not only is it lonely, but it seems that something reasonable to ask is how two people came together in the first place.

Buddhism seems to violate the principle of livability in this, and in similar regards. What I mean by this is that it might be a nice idea to emotionally and mentally detach for some, but to actually be able to live it out causes deep conflict and inconsistencies. Conflict in the sense that I really feel like I am supposed to care for my child and through caring I might become more attached, yet I should remain unattached. So then how can I Love anyone without being attached to him or her? It seems that living in this manner will only cause internal conflict, which is the exact opposite of the goal that Buddhism is trying to reach.

Living with a Buddhist perspective is also inconsistent. On one hand, I say that I must be unattached to people, places, animals, and things, yet if Buddhism is a thing, then I must be attached to it in order to be unattached. In other words, “I desire to rid myself of all desires.” But to do this, the desire to rid oneself of all desires still exists, and one has not rid one’s self of all desires.

 

Perhaps the better way is not to give up all of our desires, but to have the right desires.

 

Consider the Sermon on the Mount in Matthew 5-7. Here we find several examples of having the right desires. Jesus says in Matthew 5:16, “In the same way, let your light shine before others, so that they may see your good works and give glory to your Father who is in heaven.” We are to desire to do good works in order to give glory to our Father who is in Heaven.

In Matthew 5:44-46, Jesus says, “But I say to you, Love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you, so that you may be sons of your Father who is in heaven. For he makes his sun rise on the evil and on the good, and sends rain on the just and on the unjust. For if you love those who love you, what reward do you have? Do not even the tax collectors do the same?” If we love our enemies, wouldn’t that likely help them become better people as well? This seems far better than a Bodhisattva
helping a person becoming enlightened (more on this below). 

In chapter six, verses five and six, Jesus says, “And when you pray, you must not be like the hypocrites. For they love to stand and pray in the synagogues and at the street corners, that they may be seen by others. Truly, I say to you, they have received their reward. But when you pray, go into your room and shut the door and pray to your Father who is in secret. And your Father who sees in secret will reward you.” This is a classic example of not having wrong desires but having right desires. The only desires we should be giving up are the desires that are wrong. It is not evil or bad or wrong to have good desires, is it?

Finally, we will discuss the Golden Rule, which Jesus says in Matthew chapter seven, verse twelve: “So whatever you wish that others would do to you, do also to them, for this is the Law and the Prophets.” What Jesus is saying here is that we measure the way we should treat someone else by the way we desire to be treated. Clearly, it is not wrong to have good desires, but Buddhism teaches that all desires are wrong or bad in the sense that being attached to something is what causes the suffering in the first place.

After we have discussed the first three of the four noble truths, and how they are philosophical in nature (yet not without their own problems), we now move to the fourth noble truth, which is where Buddhism becomes a religion. The thing is, without the fourth noble truth, Buddhism is incomplete. Without the fourth noble truth, could it rightly be called Buddhism? It seems like this is not so, since the third noble truth requires the fourth noble truth.

The fourth noble truth is that we are able to release the attachment to things by following the noble eight-fold path. In other words, in the third noble truth, we discover that we become free from suffering by detaching ourselves from people, places, animals, and things. The way to do this is to follow the eight-fold noble path, which again is the fourth noble truth.

Interestingly and ironically, the eight-fold noble path seems to enforce “right” desires:

 

1. Right View

2. Right Intention

3. Right Speech

4. Right Actions

5. Right Livelihood

6. Right Effort

7. Right Meditation

8. Right Concentration

 

By following the noble eight-fold path is how a Buddhist will ultimately reach enlightenment, which is basically, insight into transcendent reality. The question here seems like it should again be, “Does the Buddhist desire to become enlightened?” It seems that again, if the person does not desire to become enlightened, then he or she is not following true Buddhism. In order to release oneself of suffering through the act of detachment of people, places, animals, or things, one must religiously follow the noble eight-fold path. If that isn't clear, the fourth noble truth is what makes Buddhism a religion. It would not be Buddhism without the fourth noble truth.

 

The consequences of Buddhism being a religion

 

If there are a bunch of religions that all say that they are the correct way (which is the case, even in Hinduism, which claims that all religions are true), then they cannot all be true. In fact, just because there are a bunch of religions that claim to know and show the truth about reality does not even mean that any of them are absolutely (or as Buddhists like to say, “ultimately”) true. Either all of the religions are wrong or only one of them is correct. The reason for this is because by claiming that they are the one correct way to understand the truth of reality, they are claiming exclusivity. In other words, simply by their existence, every religion disagrees with the other religions that are not themselves. For instance, if Hinduism agreed with Buddhism on all parts, how would one be able to tell them apart?
What would be the difference if there were no differences? The fact is, these religions do disagree with one another, which is why we know them separately as Hinduism and Buddhism, and not simply one or the other. The major consequence of Buddhism being a religion then, is that it finds itself in the long list of religions that claim to know the truth about reality, but is Buddhism the one true reality? I think that we have already seen above that Buddhism ultimately fails under its own weight and so it cannot be true.

 

An example of exclusivity

 

Christianity claims exclusivity in that Christ rose bodily from the grave, and that the only way to be saved is by confessing with your mouth that Jesus is Lord and by believing that God raised Him from the dead (See Romans 10:9). Many religions disagree with this claim, and the fact of the matter can only be one of two options. Either the claim “Jesus rose again bodily from death” is a true claim, or it is a false claim. This claim either reflects reality or it does not. There are no other alternatives. As we see from Romans 10:9, mentioned above, we find that Christianity is based on historical fact. If it is true that Jesus rose from the dead (which is what this author holds), then Christianity is true because this is the event in history that Christianity hangs its hat on. Paul says in 1 Corinthians 15:12-19,

 

“Now if Christ is proclaimed as raised from the dead, how can some of you say that there is no resurrection of the dead? 13 But if there is no resurrection of the dead, then not even Christ has been raised. 14 And if Christ has not been raised, then our preaching is in vain and your faith is in vain. 15 We are even found to be misrepresenting God, because we testified about God that he raised Christ, whom he did not raise if it is true that the dead are not raised. 16 For if the dead are not raised, not even Christ has been raised. 17 And if Christ has not been raised, your faith is futile and you are still in your sins. 18 Then those also who have fallen asleep in Christ have perished. 19 If in Christ we have hope in this life only, we are of all people most to be pitied.”

 

In this passage, Paul says that Christianity is fake if Christ is not risen from the dead (I say this in on-going terms because He is still risen! He defeated death!). If Christ is not risen from the dead, then “your faith is futile.”

I encourage you to look at the evidence of the Resurrection. Buddhism has nothing on Christianity. Nor does any other religion. There can only be one true religion (if any), and Christianity is it. The reason we know this is because God became a man and came to earth in the body of Jesus Christ who proved who He was through His miracles and through the things He said. For instance, in John 14:6, Jesus said, “I am the way, the truth, and the life; no one comes to the Father but through me.” Imagine your neighbor saying this. Would you take him seriously? Obviously not. But why do we, and billions of other people throughout history, take it seriously when Jesus says it? Because He proved who He was through the things that He did. Your neighbor never walked on water, changed water to wine, healed the sick, made the blind see, raised the dead to life, and the list goes on and on and on (see John 21:25).

You might wonder how we can know that these things are actually historical themselves, and it seems that there are many things which are convincing, but the fact that the Apostles of Christ literally died for what they saw, is convincing enough in itself to believe that what they actually saw Christ do with their own eyes, is true. If it were all a joke, they would have recanted. They would have backpedaled. If the Romans found the body of Jesus, they would have paraded it around to please the Jews who were against Jesus at that time in fear of a revolt. If the Jews found the body of Jesus, they would have done the same thing. The problem is they never produced a body because Christ is Risen.

 

You shall know the truth and the truth will set you free.

Written by Nace Howell through the grace of the Lord Jesus 

© Nace Howell, 2022



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How to Show a Mormon the Difference Between the Mormon Jesus and the Biblical Jesus

I find that Mormons frequently claim that they are Christians, and that they want to be referred to as Christians, and that they have even recently sought to distance themselves from the word “Mormon.” The problem is, they worship another Jesus, and here is how to show them the difference between the Mormon Jesus and the Biblical Jesus. Before we get to that, some clarifications are necessary. Specifically, that they cannot even distance themselves from being called "Mormons."   The Mormon President Russell Nelson said,    “What’s in a name or, in this case, a nickname? When it comes to nicknames of the Church, such as the “LDS Church,” the “Mormon Church,” or the “Church of the Latter-day Saints,” the most important thing in those names is the absence of the Savior’s name. To remove the Lord’s name from the Lord’s Church is a major victory for Satan. When we discard the Savior’s name, we are subtly disregarding all that Jesus Christ did for us—even His Atonement.” [1]   So,

The Dividing Line of Doctrine

How and Where to Make Divisions... Sometimes, I get asked “Why do you get so up at arms about other religions?” or, “Why do you pick on other religions so much?” I think the following will help you see where I’m coming from, before I spill the beans on such.   We have difficulty sometimes in discovering where to make divisions when considering where to spend our money, and who to support, where to make purchases, and where not to do such. We also often have difficulty on how to know if a church or a congregation is a place where someone can actually become saved. Like, how can we know that a Mormon is likely not saved but we can know that a regular church attender at a gospel sound church is likely saved? What is it that would make my church attendance at a specific body no longer appropriate? Both answers to these questions deal with doctrine. If a company is pushing false doctrine using their influence and power to push a heretical doctrine or teaching, this is often when the red fla

Joseph Smith had the same Demon that influenced Muhammad

What does Islam have in common with Mormonism? Seriously, the similarities are uncanny. Like human beings, demons are creatures of habit . The Bible does not tell us much about them, but from what it does tell us, we can learn a lot. Jesus reveals to us some things about their behavior: When the unclean spirit has gone out of a person, it passes through waterless places seeking rest, but finds none. Then it says, ‘I will return to my house from which I came.’ And when it comes, it finds the house empty, swept, and put in order. Then it goes and brings with it seven other spirits more evil than itself, and they enter and dwell there, and the last state of that person is worse than the first… [1]   Jesus clearly knows that demons have typical behaviors. He has seen it many times before. He lets us know that a typical behavior for a demon is that home is where the heart is . When your house crumbles to the ground, you move to a new one. Likewise, when a person dies, the demon is f

The Highest Virtue

A virtue is a trait of excellence. What is the highest virtue? It seems that based on the nature of truth, that truth itself is perhaps the highest virtue. For instance, I could say that love is the highest virtue, but then I could ask the question of whether that is true or not. If it is or isn’t true, this places truth virtuously higher than love, at least in some sense. The fact that I can question love through the lens of truth seems to place truth above love in height of virtue. On the other hand, if I said that truth is the highest virtue, then it seems that it would be loving to tell others the truth! Perhaps truth and love go hand in hand, but this also concerns the nature of what truth is.  Truth is a requirement for love, which I argue here , but is love a requirement for truth? Love must contain truth in order to be  true  love. But truth does not have to contain love in order to be true truth. Take for instance, mathematics, or numbers in general… Sometimes, the truth hurts

The Two Systems: A Confused Definition of Love

A couple years ago I wrote an article called  the Jehovah’s Witness training videos . The article was meant to be humorous in a sense, because there are likely not any actual training videos, but it seems that they have all watched them. We can suspect this because they all often have the same points of conversation. When you talk about the Trinity, they will use the Bible like a machine gun and shoot you with verses. The verses are always the same: Colossians 1:15, Mark 10:18… So, there is an implication that they all have the same information. There is one source from where they gather their patterns and behaviors. Similarly, I think we can see the power behind the system of the world as well. We can see what this power is like by the tracks he leaves behind. The contrast of the two systems is really seen in Revelation 14:8. “Fallen, fallen is Babylon the great, she who made all nations drink the wine of the passion of her sexual immorality.” John is using the word  Babylon  here for

Objectivity is the Language of Heaven

NDErs (i. e. people who have claimed to have had a   Near Death Experience ) often report that when they go to Heaven, they frequently see and recognize people such as friends and family members. It is often also reported that when they were communicating with friends and relatives, they realized that they weren’t speaking English, but that they were telepathically speaking to one another.   It seems it would be impossible to have communication with others without learning every language that has ever existed under the sun, but since heaven is a perfect place, [1]  then communication should be perfect as well. In other words, it seems unlikely that there are barriers to communication. So, I should be able to communicate with the Apostles, upon my arrival for instance, but how? I personally only really know how to speak English fluently. My Spanish, Japanese, German, Russian, Chinese, and Latin is like that of a child, and my Greek is only in reading and writing.  If communication is me

Defending Christianity against Mormonism

“But in your hearts set apart Christ as Lord. Always be prepared to give an answer to everyone who asks you to give the reason for the hope that you have. But do this with gentleness and respect ” (NIV 1 Peter 3:15). In other words, LOVE THEM . Mormons                                                             Biblical Truths Mormons are monolaters, meaning, they believe in many gods, yet worship only one. LDS believe that “As man is, God once was; and as God is, man may become.” LDS do not believe in Hell. LDS believe God is flesh and bones. LDS believe in baptism for the dead. LDS believe Jesus and Satan are created brothers. LDS do not believe in the Trinity. LDS believe that “it is by grace we are saved, after all we can do” (Nephi 25:23). Deuteronomy 6:4 says, “Hear, O Israel: The Lord our God, the Lord is one” (See also Isaiah 43:11; Acts 5:4; 1 Timothy 2:5; Exodus 20:3; et. al.). God kn

The Evidence and Power of Testimony

What to say to People who Demand more Evidence for God. Why is there something rather than nothing? Glacier National Park. © Nace Howell, 2018. The question is, how much evidence do you require? Would Jesus have to come back and slap you in the face with evidence that He is God? It seems to me that there is a line we must draw. We do this in all other areas of our lives, so why would we treat theism any different? When a court convicts, they do so “beyond a reasonable doubt.” I would like to take a few moments to explore this a bit. But before we get to that, I want to pose a question, which is… why are you the standard? What makes you think He has to prove His existence to everyone individually? He already created the universe from nothing. In the beginning, there was a big bang. Seriously… do you believe your mom when she tells you a story about her day? Did you believe the reports of 9/11 when they were happening? Do you accept the testimony of anything you hear on social

Self-tests of Some of the World's Religions

It is fairly common for a religion of the world to give itself a sort of test for truth, since this is one question that is asked of any religion: “Why should I believe what you are telling me is true?” After all, the answer to such a question will ultimately result in followers of specific beliefs and doctrines, let alone religions, or will result in a lack of followers.  If a religion can answer this question posed by seekers and thinkers, and therefore train its adherents to be able to answer why a religion is true, this will inevitably help people believe in such, even if the claims are false. If there is no answer, this is where a religion will perhaps find more trouble for itself.  Many religions make an appeal to a higher authority, namely,  God , for the veracity of their existence and as a result, no one can question the truth from such an authority. This is correct in a sense, that  if in fact God is making such a claim, then what is said or stated is true , but the question

Argument from Beauty: Evangelical Christians have Neglected a Favorable Catalyst for the Gospel

It seems to me that some Evangelical Christians have taken a certain biblical passage in the wrong direction. Perhaps I, considering myself to be an Evangelical Christian, am guilty of such as well. Romans 12:1-2 says, “I appeal to you therefore, brothers, by the mercies of God, to present your bodies as a living sacrifice, holy and acceptable to God, which is your spiritual worship. Do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewal of your mind, that by testing you may discern what is the will of God, what is good and acceptable and perfect.”  Verse 2 is where we get the phrase,  be in the world, but don’t be of the world . What this means is that we should know our place. Our place is in heaven. The Bible says that we are citizens of heaven, and that we should think and act as if we are. Philippians 3:20-21 says, “But our citizenship is in heaven, and from it we await a Savior, the Lord Jesus Christ, who will transform our lowly body to be like his glorious body, b