Skip to main content

Is Charlie Kirk a Martyr? A Philosophical and Biblical Look at the Truth of the Matter

Many words have been spoken over whether or not Charlie Kirk is a Christian martyr. It has seemed to me from the beginning that Kirk was a Christian martyr, and I knew that people would be divided on the subject. So, after several of my own discussions, nine days after Charlie Kirk’s assassination, I crafted a philosophical argument.

The Truth of the Matter, Philosophically Speaking

 

1. If Charlie Kirk’s values were built on the foundation of Christ (P), then the truths that he taught from these values were the reason he was murdered (Q).

2. If the truths he taught from these values were the reason he was murdered (Q), then Charlie kirk is a martyr (R).

3. Charlie Kirk’s values were built on the foundation of Christ (P).

4. If Charlie Kirk’s values were built on the foundation of Christ (P), then Charlie Kirk is a martyr (R).

5. Charlie Kirk is a Christian Martyr (R).

 

(Hypothetical syllogism 1,2)

(Modus ponens 3,4)

 

For a frame of reference, see these two passages below with special emphasis on the last sentences of both passages.

 

1 Corinthians 3:10-11,

"According to the grace of God given to me, like a skilled master builder I laid a foundation, and someone else is building upon it. Let each one take care how he builds upon it. For no one can lay a foundation other than that which is laid, which is Jesus Christ.

 

John 4:36-38,

"Even now the one who reaps draws a wage and harvests a crop for eternal life, so that the sower and the reaper may be glad together. Thus the saying ‘One sows and another reaps’ is true. I sent you to reap what you have not worked for. Others have done the hard work, and you have reaped the benefits of their labor.”

 

No True Scotsman 


In an objection to my argument, a person stated, 

 

“[Charlie Kirk] was lost and blind and not in the body of Christ. He believed Catholics and Mormons are Christians and right before he was shot, he was praising Mormons. Those who preach Jesus doesn't mean their (sic) one of his sheep. Jesus said it in the Bible. Kirk die (sic) lost.

“On Michael Knowles show he said he believe Catholics are Christians and at the event he said, "we need the strong Mormon church back in this country." Therefore, he believes Mormons are Christians.

"If he was a true Christian with the holy spirit in him, he would denounce the Mormon church and catholic church and preach to them they are lost and will go to hell if they stay in those false religions. Jesus said the blind can't lead the blind or they all fall into the pit."

 

If this is all true, that Charlie Kirk was not a true Christian, then he would obviously not be a Christian martyr. But is the reasoning here sound? 

 

Right off the bat, this is a textbook no true Scotsman fallacy. What the objector is saying is that no true Christian would ever not denounce the Mormon church. In other words, “All true Christians denounce the Mormon church.” In other, other words, one is not a Christian unless they denounce the Mormon church. There are several problems with this. First, isn’t the Christian life progressive in its understanding? 2 Peter 1:5-8 sheds some light,

 

“For this very reason, make every effort to add to your faith goodness; and to goodness, knowledge; and to knowledge, self-control; and to self-control, perseverance; and to perseverance, godliness; and to godliness, mutual affection; and to mutual affection, love. For if you possess these qualities in increasing measure, they will keep you from being ineffective and unproductive in your knowledge of our Lord Jesus Christ.”

 

The key idea here is the phrase, “increasing measure.” We grow in Christ as Christians. When we become justified before God, we are not instantly omniscient. Yet, this is what the objection implies. I am not arguing at this point that Charlie Kirk didn’t know that Mormons are not Christians, I am just arguing that the charges against his martyrdom, that he was not a Christian because he said that "we need the strong Mormon church back in this country" does not follow.

We can unpack this further… If Charlie Kirk was not a true Christian because he did not denounce Mormonism, then this also means that children who become Christians are also not true Christians because they don’t denounce Mormonism. Neither are those who become brand new Christians through the work of missionaries in third world countries. Doesn’t a person have to know a considerable amount about both Christianity as well as Mormonism in order to know that it is not the same as true Christianity? So, if someone who recently became a Christian who knows nothing about Mormonism, according to the above objector, they are not a true Christian. The fallacious reasoning is clearly seen through reducing his argument to the absurd. 

The point is this, every Christian is at a different level of growth in Christ. This is again, not to say that Kirk didn’t understand the difference between Christians and Mormons, but simply to show that the charge made against Kirk that he believed Mormons are Christians from the evidence provided does not logically follow. When Kirk made the remarks at the event concerning Mormons (see more below), he was more likely focused on the moral standing of Mormons and their emphasis on family values as opposed to the anti-family LGBTQ agenda. Even militant atheist, Richard Dawkins calls himself a "Cultural Christian" (See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=COHgEFUFWyg). How is it any different for Kirk to focus on the family values of Mormons, but still not call himself one or theologically endorse Mormonism? Charlie Kirk was clearly referring to the culture of Mormonism, and safely so, because it is in a completely different category than the salvific beliefs of Mormonism. 


We cannot demand or even assume that every Christian is at the same level of growth in Christ. This can land us in trouble (See Romans 14). If Kirk clearly understood the false claims of Mormonism and then still called them true brothers, then that is different, but even then it would still raise the question of whether Kirk himself was a false brother, or simply misinformed. In any event, I still don't see where he calls Mormons "true brothers" anywhere (see Galatians 2:4 for reference).

 

This image below has been offered as a defense to the argument that Charlie Kirk could not be a martyr because he was not a true Christian. The quotation still fails to show how Charlie Kirk believed that Mormons are Christians. In fact, it is much the opposite. In the quotation, Kirk does not call Mormons Christians but instead singles them out as Mormons in every sentence. "You Mormons" places distance between them and him.


 


 

The Truth of the Matter, Biblically Speaking


As far as the truth of the matter goes biblically speaking, Mike Winger correctly points out that since we call John the Baptist a Christian martyr (good luck arguing against 2000 years of Christian history on that one), then we can also call Charlie Kirk a Christian martyr. https://www.facebook.com/reel/1247996730349690

 

See the story in Matthew 14:1-12:

“1At that time Herod the tetrarch heard the reports about Jesus, 2 and he said to his attendants, “This is John the Baptist; he has risen from the dead! That is why miraculous powers are at work in him.”

3 Now Herod had arrested John and bound him and put him in prison because of Herodias, his brother Philip’s wife, 4 for John had been saying to him: “It is not lawful for you to have her.” 5 Herod wanted to kill John, but he was afraid of the people, because they considered John a prophet.

6 On Herod’s birthday the daughter of Herodias danced for the guests and pleased Herod so much 7 that he promised with an oath to give her whatever she asked. 8 Prompted by her mother, she said, “Give me here on a platter the head of John the Baptist.” 9 The king was distressed, but because of his oaths and his dinner guests, he ordered that her request be granted 10 and had John beheaded in the prison. 11 His head was brought in on a platter and given to the girl, who carried it to her mother. 12 John’s disciples came and took his body and buried it. Then they went and told Jesus.

 

The point to understand here is that John the Baptist was not directly murdered for preaching the gospel, but for telling Herod that it was not lawful for him to have his brothers wife (see verses 4, 5).

Philosophically and biblically speaking then, Charlie Kirk is a martyr of the highest order. Charlie was murdered by a woke fascist who wanted to silence him, which we can deduce from the engraved messages on the bullet cases alone.



Written by Nace Howell through the grace of the Lord Jesus



 © Nace Howell, 2025  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Evidence and Power of Testimony: The Apostolic Witness

What to say to People who Demand more Evidence for God. Why is there something rather than nothing? Glacier National Park. © Nace Howell, 2018. The question is, how much evidence do you require? Would Jesus have to come back and slap you in the face with evidence that He is God? It seems to me that there is a line we must draw. We do this in all other areas of our lives, so why would we treat theism any different? When a court convicts, they do so “beyond a reasonable doubt.” I would like to take a few moments to explore this a bit. But before we get to that, I want to pose a question, which is… why are you the standard? What makes you think He has to prove His existence to everyone individually? He already created the universe from nothing. In the beginning, there was a big bang. Seriously… do you believe your mom when she tells you a story about her day? Did you believe the reports of 9/11 when they were happening? Do you accept the testimony of anything you hear on social ...

Defending Christianity against Jehovah’s Witnesses

Defending Christianity against Jehovah’s Witnesses Using much of their “bible” to refute them “But in your hearts set apart Christ as Lord. Always be prepared to give an answer to everyone who asks you to give the reason for the hope that you have. But do this with gentleness and respect ” (NIV 1 Peter 3:15). In other words, LOVE THEM . Jehovah’s Witnesses                                       Biblical Truths Jehovah’s Witnesses do not believe in the Trinity. J.Ws. believe that Jesus was a “little god” (lower case g). J.Ws. believe in a different “ Jesus ” because of the NWT accounts. J.Ws. call themselves “Christians.” J.Ws. believe Jesus is not to be worshiped. J.Ws. believe that Jesus was once, and is again, Michael the archangel. Genesis 1:26 says, “Let Us crea...

Defending Christianity against Mormonism

“But in your hearts set apart Christ as Lord. Always be prepared to give an answer to everyone who asks you to give the reason for the hope that you have. But do this with gentleness and respect ” (NIV 1 Peter 3:15). In other words, LOVE THEM . Mormons                                                             Biblical Truths Mormons are monolaters, meaning, they believe in many gods, yet worship only one. LDS believe that “As man is, God once was; and as God is, man may become.” LDS do not believe in Hell. LDS believe God is flesh and bones. LDS believe in baptism for the dead. LDS believe Jesus and Satan are created brothers. L...

The God of the Killdozer Operator, Marvin Heemeyer

While working toward becoming an apologist and a pastor, I was a heavy equipment operator. I have over 15 years’ experience in the field, focusing on hydrological restorations (stream bank and river restoration and water dam removals) and site development for building pads (ranging from houses to one million + sq. ft. warehouses). I say this because I want to show where the heart for writing article this came about. Marvin Heemeyer purchased a bulldozer from an auction which was a Komatsu D355A with an operating weight of 97,907 lbs. (this does not include the weight of Heemeyer’s fabricated addition). In the picture above, I am operating a Komatsu D155AX which has an operating weight of 89,300 lbs. (If I remember correctly, we were developing the site for a 550,000 sq. ft. warehouse building pad). Heemeyer then went on a rampage in his armored bulldozer in Granby, CO. I don’t want to go into great details about what led up to Heemeyer doing what he did, nor do I want to go into great ...

An Overlooked Argument Against the Book of Mormon

The Book of Mormon is written in a style of language that was not used by anyone at the time that it was written and published. This style of English is called   Early Modern English . This fact is an anachronism that I find to be severely overlooked by those who seek the truth about the Book of Mormon. Many Mormons will instantly write this objection off concerning the veracity of the Book of Mormon, even to the point of saying that such an objection is lazy and pitiful, while not giving any rebuttals worth their weight.   I recently insinuated the absurdity of the Book of Mormon by asking the question, “Why was the Book of Mormon translated into Early Modern English?” I’m saying that it is absurd that the BoM uses an out-of-date language. A Mormon replied to me that the Bible has equal absurdities. He said, “Why is [The BoM translation into Early Modern English] absurd? Is it absurd that God uses a donkey to speak to Balaam in Numbers 22?”  First, this is a  tu quo...

Using Guilt to Guide to the Truth

While taking a cultural apologetics class in my doctorate, I rambled along in a 30-page paper and in it, I wrote that, “I define religion as an anthropological system consisting of worship which is often filled with specific sacred rituals that seeks to appease or eradicate guilt.” My professor red-penned this and said that I am not yet in an authoritative position to make such definitions. But I was never asked how I came up with such a definition. The thing is, working on my second post-graduate degree in apologetics, studying many other religions on a deeper level was inevitable, and  by this, I noticed a pattern in all of them which was the fact that they all seek to appease or eradicate guilt, including   Buddhism , even though   many adherents of Buddhism claim that it is not a religion . The point is that all religions seek to eradicate guilt on some level, because   guilt crosses all cultures and times, to all people .   Guilt transcends all people. The ...

Joseph Smith had the same Demon that influenced Muhammad

What does Islam have in common with Mormonism? Seriously, the similarities are uncanny. Like human beings, demons are creatures of habit . The Bible does not tell us much about them, but from what it does tell us, we can learn a lot. Jesus reveals to us some things about their behavior: When the unclean spirit has gone out of a person, it passes through waterless places seeking rest, but finds none. Then it says, ‘I will return to my house from which I came.’ And when it comes, it finds the house empty, swept, and put in order. Then it goes and brings with it seven other spirits more evil than itself, and they enter and dwell there, and the last state of that person is worse than the first… [1]   Jesus clearly knows that demons have typical behaviors. He has seen it many times before. He lets us know that a typical behavior for a demon is that home is where the heart is . When your house crumbles to the ground, you move to a new one. Likewise, when a person dies, the demon ...

How to Show a Jehovah's Witness That Jesus Was—and Still Should Be—Worshiped

Jehovah’s Witnesses  (JW’s) have a severe problem with the question of worship when it comes to Jesus. They say that Jesus is not God, and that because of the First of  the Ten Commandments , we should not worship Him. Is this correct thinking biblically speaking? In this article, I will argue why it is not correct, and I will do this from the New World Translation (NWT) which is the  Jehovah’s Witness corrupted version of the Bible . Allow me to briefly say here that they believe that Jesus is a “lower case g” god, which immediately has scriptural issues in their own translation with the First of the Ten Commandments, namely that they would have “other gods besides me” (NWT of the First of the Ten Commandments).   First, since I have argued in multiple places concerning John 1:1 that Jesus is God, which implies our worship of Him, I will direct you to those articles  HERE ,  HERE , and  HERE .  Moving forward, I want to look at three specific pri...

Baptism is Not Necessary for Salvation According to the Early Church

Let’s dive right in. The Bible says in Acts 2:37-41,    Now when they heard this they were cut to the heart, and said to Peter and the rest of the apostles, “Brothers, what shall we do?” And Peter said to them, “Repent and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins, and you will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit. For the promise is for you and for your children and for all who are far off, everyone whom the Lord our God calls to himself.” And with many other words he bore witness and continued to exhort them, saying, “Save yourselves from this crooked generation.” So those who received his word were baptized, and there were added that day about three thousand souls.   The phrase in Acts 2:38 that reads, “for the forgiveness of your sins” modifies the word repentance, not the word baptism.  See more about this Here .   What is interesting is that those who translate the above verse as meaning that baptism is a requ...

The Jehovah's Witness Training Videos

How your conversation will likely go with a Jehovah's Witness. The Videos… they have all seen them. The videos that they have seen are like when you start a new job and watch these old, poor quality, cheesy DVDs (or VHS) about how your job is performed safely. You’re sitting in the room alone for three hours and fifteen minutes, watching everyone in their PPE do the wrong things and then the right things, so you can know the difference between them. Anyone who has worked at Wal-Mart, or a factory, or is a heavy equipment operator knows exactly what “the videos” look and sound like.  Jehovah’s Witnesses (Hereafter, JWs) must go through a similar situation because their responses to my questions and challenges is exactly the same, often verbatim, every time. I have to assume that they have all seen the same video. I have not seen the videos myself, but I definitely seem to have a cumulative case for believing that they exist. Granted, this group of JWs I'm referring to are the ...